Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies
Published on: September 30, 2016
Avelumab Plus Intermittent Axitinib in Previously Untreated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. The Tide-A
Roberto Iacovelli1, Chiara Ciccarese2, Sebastiano Buti3
1Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Medicine and Translational Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Background And Objective:
Combinations of VEGFR-TKIs plus ICI against PD1/PD-L1 are the standard first-line therapy for patients with mRCC, irrespective of the prognostic class. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of withdrawing the VEGFR-TKI but continuing the anti- PD1/PD-L1 in patients who achieve response to their combination.
Methods:
This was a single-arm phase 2 trial in patients with treatment naïve mRCC with prior nephrectomy, without symptomatic/bulky disease and no liver metastases. Enrolled patients received axitinib+avelumab, after 36 weeks of therapy those who achieved tumor response interrupted axitinib and continued avelumab maintenance until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients without progression eight weeks after the axitinib interruption. Secondary endpoints were the median value for progression free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) and the safety in the overall population.
Key Findings And Limitations:
79 patients were enrolled and 75 evaluated for efficacy. A total of 29 (38%) patients had axitinib withdrawn, as per the study design, with 72% of them having no progression after eight weeks and thus achieving the primary endpoint. The mPFS of the overall population was 24 months while the mOS was not reached. The ORR was 76% (12% CR, 64% PR), with 19% of patients having stable disease. In the patients who discontinued axitinib, the incidence of AEs of any grade was 59% and 3% for grade 3 or 4. This study was limited by the lack of the comparative arm.
Conclusions And Clinical Implications:
The TIDE-A study demonstrates that the withdrawal of VEGFR-TKI with ICI maintenance is feasible for selected mRCC patients with evidence of response to the VEGFR-TKI+ICI combination employed in first-line therapy. Axitinib interruption with avelumab maintenance led to decreased side effects and should be further investigated as a new strategy to delay tumor progression.
Insights
Withdrawing VEGFR-TKI (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) while continuing PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is feasible in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who respond to combination therapy, reducing side effects.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Renal Cell Carcinoma Research
Background:
- First-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) typically involves combinations of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD1/PD-L1.
- Standard therapy is administered irrespective of patient prognostic classification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and safety of discontinuing VEGFR-TKI therapy while maintaining anti-PD1/PD-L1 treatment in mRCC patients who have shown a response to the initial combination therapy.
- To establish a potential new treatment strategy for mRCC management.
Main Methods:
- A single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted involving treatment-naïve mRCC patients with prior nephrectomy and no symptomatic/bulky disease or liver metastases.
- Patients received axitinib (a VEGFR-TKI) combined with avelumab (an anti-PD-L1 ICI). After 36 weeks, responders interrupted axitinib and continued avelumab maintenance until disease progression.
- The primary endpoint was the rate of disease progression-free survival at eight weeks post-axitinib interruption. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Main Results:
- Of 79 enrolled patients, 75 were evaluated for efficacy. Axitinib was withdrawn in 29 patients (38%), with 72% achieving the primary endpoint of no progression at eight weeks.
- The overall population achieved a median PFS of 24 months, with a median OS not reached. The objective response rate (ORR) was 76% (12% complete response, 64% partial response).
- In patients who discontinued axitinib, adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurred in 59%, with 3% experiencing grade 3 or 4 AEs. The study's limitation is the absence of a comparative arm.
Conclusions:
- The TIDE-A study indicates that withdrawing VEGFR-TKI therapy while continuing ICI maintenance is a feasible strategy for selected mRCC patients responding to first-line combination treatment.
- Interrupting axitinib and continuing avelumab maintenance demonstrated reduced side effects and warrants further investigation as a novel approach to potentially delay tumor progression in mRCC.
More Related Videos
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...