Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

10:26
A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
17.2K
Machine learning natural language processing for identifying venous thromboembolism: systematic review and
Barbara D Lam1,2, Pavlina Chrysafi3, Thita Chiasakul4
1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Blood Advances
|March 24, 2024
Summary
Machine learning-natural language processing (ML-NLP) effectively identifies venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnoses in electronic health records. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates high pooled performance, offering a promising automated solution for VTE monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Computational Linguistics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of preventable hospital mortality.
- Manual review of medical records and diagnosis codes hinders efficient VTE case monitoring.
- Natural Language Processing (NLP) offers automation potential, with Machine Learning (ML)-NLP showing promise.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze studies using ML-NLP for VTE diagnosis identification in electronic health records (EHRs).
- To evaluate the pooled performance of ML-NLP models in detecting VTE diagnoses.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of studies published before May 2023, excluding rule-based NLP methods.
- Meta-analysis of the best-performing ML-NLP models for pulmonary embolism and/or deep vein thrombosis detection.
- Calculation of pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV using a random-effects model.
- Assessment of study quality using an adapted TRIPOD tool.
Main Results:
- Thirteen studies were included; 8 provided data for meta-analysis.
- Pooled sensitivity: 0.931, specificity: 0.984, PPV: 0.910, NPV: 0.985.
- Top models utilized vectorization and deep learning (e.g., CNNs).
- Studies demonstrated fair quality, meeting most TRIPOD criteria, but heterogeneity and limited external validation were noted.
Conclusions:
- ML-NLP models demonstrate high accuracy for identifying VTE diagnoses in EHRs.
- Further standardization and external validation are needed for real-world implementation of ML-NLP in VTE monitoring.

