Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
Published on: December 15, 2023
Enhanced accuracy and reduced delay in diagnosing bone tumors within an expert sarcoma network: A nationwide study
Vincent Crenn1, François Lataste2, Louise Galmiche3
1Nantes University, Nantes University Hospital (CHU Nantes), Orthopedic and Traumatological Surgical Clinic, Nantes, France; CRCI2NA (Center for Cancer Research and Immunology Nantes-Angers), INSERM, UMR 1307, CNRS UMR 6075-Team 9 CHILD (CHromatin and Transcriptional Deregulation in Pediatric Bone Sarcoma), Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Introduction:
Primary bone tumors encompass a range of rare and diverse lesions. Pathological diagnosis poses significant challenges, with histological discrepancies extensively studied in soft tissue sarcomas but lacking specific investigation in bone lesions. This study aimed to determine the rate of major diagnostic discrepancies in primary bone tumors, assessing whether initial histological analysis within an expert referral center network reduces this rate and final diagnostic delay. Additionally, we examined the impact of mandatory systematic re-reading by expert pathologists on diagnostic variation and readjustment.
Methods:
Our study cohort comprised patients with primary bone tumors, drawn from the national prospective French sarcoma network database. A total of 1075 patients were included from 2018 to 2019.
Results:
The cohort exhibited a major discrepancy rate of 24%. Within the expert referral centers network, 49 cases (7%) showed major diagnostic discrepancies in the initial analysis, compared to 207 cases (57%) outside the network (p < 0.001). Regarding the final diagnostic delay, a mean of 2.8 weeks (±4.9) was observed within the network, contrasting with 6.5 weeks (±9.1) outside the network (p < 0.001). Systematic re-reading by an expert pathologist facilitated diagnosis readjustment in 75% of the 256 cases, with 68% of all diagnostic variations occurring preoperatively.
Conclusion:
Early management within the expert network significantly reduced major diagnostic discrepancies and shortened the diagnosis delay by approximately a month. Expert pathologist systematic re-readings were responsible for diagnosis readjustments in three-quarters of cases, with two-thirds of all diagnostic variations occurring preoperatively, thereby mitigating the consequences of mistreatment.

