Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

16:08
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
Published on: February 1, 2012
16.1K
Working memory components modulation of attentional disengagement from evaluative distractor
Minmin Yan1, Yanying Tian2, Min Hai2
1Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Psych Journal
|March 26, 2024
Summary
Disengaging attention from reward distractors is slower than from loss distractors, especially when spatial working memory (WM) is engaged. Different working memory components uniquely influence attentional disengagement from distractors.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human Attention Studies
Background:
- Effective attentional disengagement is crucial for task completion.
- Reward distractors prolong attention more than loss distractors.
- The role of working memory (WM) in attentional disengagement from evaluative distractors is under-explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how working memory (WM) components influence attentional disengagement from reward versus loss distractors.
- To determine if the phonological loop or spatial components of WM differentially affect processing of evaluative distractors.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an attentional disengagement paradigm with reward/loss distractors and peripheral targets.
- Integrated tasks assessing working memory (WM) components, specifically phonological loop and spatial WM.
- Manipulated cognitive load in relation to WM tasks and distractor types.
Main Results:
- Experiment 1: The phonological loop component of WM slowed attentional disengagement from reward distractors compared to loss distractors, irrespective of cognitive load.
- Experiment 2: Low spatial WM capacity led to difficulty disengaging from reward distractors relative to loss distractors; high spatial WM capacity eliminated this difference.
- Findings indicate that evaluative distractor processing shares resources with spatial WM but not the phonological loop.
Conclusions:
- Working memory (WM) components differentially modulate attentional disengagement from evaluative distractors.
- Spatial WM resources are implicated in processing reward and loss distractors.
- The phonological loop does not appear to be a critical resource for processing these types of distractors.
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
160
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
160
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
265
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
265
Information Processing Approach
34
The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is...
34

