Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

05:35
Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
Published on: January 19, 2024
792
Mobile Apps for Common Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation Using the
Khang Jin Cheah1, Zahara Abdul Manaf1, Arimi Fitri Mat Ludin1
1Center for Healthy Ageing and Wellness, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth
|March 27, 2024
Summary
Mobile health apps for noncommunicable diseases show potential but vary in quality. Most lack professional input and scientific evidence, impacting user confidence and health outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Digital Health
- Health Informatics
- Mobile Health (mHealth)
Background:
- Mobile apps are increasingly used for self-management of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs).
- Limited understanding exists regarding the quality of available mHealth apps for conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and obesity.
- The growth of mHealth necessitates an evaluation of app quality for NCD self-management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the availability, characteristics, and quality of mHealth apps for NCD management.
- To assess features related to dietary aspects, health outcome promotion, and self-monitoring.
- To evaluate app quality using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of Google Play Store and Apple App Store (August-September 2022).
- Screening of apps based on descriptions for self-management features related to NCDs and diet.
- Analysis of app categories, involvement of healthcare professionals, scientific basis, and self-monitoring capabilities.
- Quality assessment using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).
Main Results:
- 42 mHealth apps were identified, with weight management apps being the most common (74%).
- 86% of apps included self-management features, but 88% lacked indication of healthcare professional involvement.
- No apps reported scientific evidence of efficacy; the average MARS score was 3.2/5.
- Functionality (3.9/5) and aesthetics (3.2/5) were better rated than information (3.1/5) and engagement (2.9/5).
Conclusions:
- The quality of mHealth apps for chronic disease management is inconsistent, with many falling below acceptable standards.
- A significant lack of information regarding scientific evidence and developer expertise was noted.
- Optimizing mHealth apps with healthcare professional input is crucial for enhancing user confidence and achieving health outcomes.

