Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry of Neuropeptides in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: February 14, 2012
Macroprolactin over time: Is there any point in rechecking it in people with a persistently elevated serum prolactin?
Mark Livingston1,2, Syeda F Hashmi1, Sudarshan Ramachandran3,4,5,6,7
1Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Black Country Pathology Services , Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, UK.
Objective And Design:
Macroprolactinemia may influence the interpretation of serum prolactin levels-a recognised phenomenon since 1981. The degree of macroprolactinaemia over time is less well described. We determined how macroprolactin status (based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation) varied by analysing serial measurements in hyperprolactinaemic individuals over a period of 9 years.
Patients And Measurements:
Results from 1810 individuals were included. All serum total prolactin results (measured using Roche Cobas 8000 analyser) were extracted from the laboratory information system for the period 1 January 2012 to 1 April 2021, along with relevant patient demographic/test data. Samples with a macroprolactin screening test performed (on samples with prolactin > 700 miu/L) were included in the main analysis.
Results:
During the study period, 2782 macroprolactin checks were performed (12.5% of all prolactin tests) in 1810 individuals (599 males/2183 females, median-age: 35, interquartile range: 25-47, range: 16-93 years). Multiple macroprolactin checks were carried out on 465 patients (1437 measurements) with 94 patients (141 measurements) screening positive (<60% recovery). Only 19 patients (18 female) had at least one result above and one below the 60% screening cut-off, with 10 of these patients having results close to the 60% cut-off; in 9 patients, results were clearly different between repeat samples. In seven cases, the adjusted monomeric prolactin showed a potentially clinically significant difference.
Conclusions:
In this study, only 19/465 patients appeared to change macroprolactin status based on a 60% PEG recovery cut-off. The majority of these 19 patients were on antipsychotic/antidepressant medication(s) or had a prolactinoma; in only 7 did monomeric prolactin change significantly. This suggests that once macroprolactin status has been determined, clinical decision making is rarely affected by repeating it.
Insights
Macroprolactinemia status, identified using polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, rarely changes over time in hyperprolactinemic individuals. Repeat testing of macroprolactin is unlikely to alter clinical decisions once initial status is established.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Macroprolactinemia, a condition where prolactin binds to antibodies, can interfere with accurate serum prolactin level interpretation.
- While the existence of macroprolactinemia is recognized, its stability over time in hyperprolactinemic patients is less understood.
- Understanding macroprolactin status variability is crucial for appropriate clinical management of hyperprolactinemia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the variability of macroprolactin status over a 9-year period in individuals with hyperprolactinemia.
- To determine how frequently macroprolactin status changes based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation assay results.
- To assess the clinical significance of any observed changes in macroprolactin status.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of serial serum prolactin measurements from 1810 individuals collected between January 2012 and April 2021.
- Utilized Roche Cobas 8000 analyser for prolactin measurements and laboratory information system for data extraction.
- Macroprolactin screening was performed using PEG precipitation on samples with prolactin levels >700 mIU/L, with a cut-off of <60% recovery indicating macroprolactin presence.
Main Results:
- A total of 2782 macroprolactin screening tests were conducted on 1810 individuals.
- Macroprolactin screening was positive in 141 measurements from 94 patients.
- Only 19 patients showed a change in macroprolactin status (above and below the 60% PEG recovery cut-off) during the study period; in 7, this change was clinically significant.
Conclusions:
- Macroprolactin status, determined by PEG precipitation, demonstrated stability in the majority of hyperprolactinemic patients over a 9-year period.
- Changes in macroprolactin status were infrequent and rarely led to significant alterations in monomeric prolactin levels.
- Repeat macroprolactin testing is generally not indicated for clinical decision-making once the initial status is established.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Regression Toward the Mean
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Dependence of Elimination Half-Life and Dose Clearance
A study on guinea pigs examined the...
Dosage Regimen: Multiple Oral Dosage
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test

