Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

10:32
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
18.5K
Measuring Occupational Well-Being Indicators: Scale Construction and Validation
Hanvedes Daovisan1, Ungsinun Intarakamhang1
1Behavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok 10110, Thailand.
Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 28, 2024
Summary
This study developed and validated the Occupational Well-Being (OWB) scale in Laos using a large sample. The OWB-47 scale demonstrated a reliable, unidimensional structure, confirming its validity for assessing well-being.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health Psychology
- Psychometrics
- Cross-cultural Psychology
Background:
- Assessing occupational well-being (OWB) is crucial for employee health and productivity.
- Existing OWB measures may not be culturally relevant or validated for diverse populations, including Laos.
- There is a need for a psychometrically sound instrument to measure OWB in the Laotian context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a comprehensive Occupational Well-Being (OWB) scale tailored for the Laotian workforce.
- To ensure the scale captures affective, professional, social, cognitive, psychological, and psychosomatic dimensions of well-being.
- To establish the psychometric properties of the developed OWB scale.
Main Methods:
- Scale development using multiple sampling data from a large Laotian sample (n = 1745).
- Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to identify underlying factors of the OWB scale.
- Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and cross-validation using Stata 19 to assess construct validity and model fit.
Main Results:
- A valid 47-item Occupational Well-Being (OWB-47) scale was successfully developed.
- Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) confirmed a unidimensional structure for the OWB scale.
- The OWB scale demonstrated significant correlations with a six-dimensional model, supporting its convergent validity.
Conclusions:
- The OWB-47 scale is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument for measuring occupational well-being in Laos.
- The findings support the acceptability of the unidimensional model for assessing OWB in the study population.
- This validated scale can be utilized for research and practical applications to enhance employee well-being in Laos.
Related Concept Videos
Ordinal Level of Measurement
23.6K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
23.6K
Dimensions of Health and Illness
7.3K
The factors influencing the health-illness continuum can be internal or external and may or may not be under conscious control. They are related to the following eight human dimensions, and each dimension is interrelated to one other.
7.3K
Data Validation
5.0K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.0K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation
8.3K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
8.3K
Quantifying Work
19.3K
As a system undergoes a change, its internal energy can change, and energy can be transferred from the system to the surroundings, or from the surroundings to the system.
19.3K

