Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview of Microscopy Techniques01:22

Overview of Microscopy Techniques

10.3K
The early pioneers of microscopy opened a window into the invisible world of microorganisms. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes that leveraged nonvisible light, such as fluorescence microscopy that uses an ultraviolet light source and electron microscopy that uses short-wavelength electron beams. These advances significantly improved magnification, image resolution, and contrast. By comparison, the...
10.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From discomfort to danger: Exploring how affective obstacle properties influence avoidance in stepping.

Perception·2025
Same author

Obstacle avoidance of physical, stereoscopic, and pictorial objects.

Virtual reality·2025
Same author

Action Perception in Athletes: Expertise Facilitates Perceptual Discrimination.

Perceptual and motor skills·2023
Same author

Crossmodal Texture Perception Is Illumination-Dependent.

Multisensory research·2023
Same author

Bimanual Grasping Adheres to Weber's Law.

i-Perception·2021
Same author

Perceptual uncertainty and action consequences independently affect hand movements in a virtual environment.

Scientific reports·2020
Same journal

Musical training increases anticipatory responding and predictive control in sequence learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

When emotions hurt: negative interpretations of bodily signals and interoceptive difficulties in fibromyalgia.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Emotion-specific modality effects in auditory and visual perception of emotion.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The effect of retrieval practice on incidental memory is modulated by emotional valence: evidence of ERPs.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The length of a piece of string: Where the whole is more than the sum of its constituent parts.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The influence of older age, individual differences in cognitive abilities, and state of mind on learning novel categories.

Psychological research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

1.6K

Grasping tiny objects.

Martin Giesel1, Federico De Filippi2,3, Constanze Hesse2

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, William Guild Building, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK. martin@martingiesel.net.

Psychological Research
|March 30, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Grasping very small objects (<5mm) revealed that maximum grip aperture (MGA) is not always a reliable indicator of object size. The digits-in-space hypothesis best explains these findings in visuomotor control.

More Related Videos

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

8.4K
Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace
09:11

Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace

Published on: August 8, 2019

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

1.6K
Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

8.4K
Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace
09:11

Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace

Published on: August 8, 2019

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Visuomotor control
  • Human motor behavior
  • Perception-action coupling

Background:

  • Maximum grip aperture (MGA) is a key metric in grasping studies, reflecting object size representation.
  • Factors like safety and comfort can influence MGA, potentially confounding perceptual effects.
  • Grasping of very small objects (<5mm) remains under-investigated, limiting evaluation of grasping theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the scaling of maximum grip aperture (MGA) and manual estimation aperture (MEA) for very small objects.
  • To compare the predictive power of three prominent grasping theories (perception-action model, digits-in-space hypothesis, biomechanical account) for small object grasping.
  • To determine the reliability of MGA as an indicator of object size in different tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted with human participants grasping and manually estimating the height of square cuboids.
  • Object heights ranged from 0.5mm to 20mm across experiments.
  • Maximum grip apertures (MGAs), manual estimation apertures (MEAs), and just-noticeable differences (JNDs) were measured.

Main Results:

  • Manual estimation apertures (MEAs) consistently scaled with object height and followed Weber's law.
  • MGAs scaled with object height for larger objects (5-20mm) but not consistently for very small objects (0.5-5mm).
  • Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) for grasping did not scale with object height in either experiment.

Conclusions:

  • The digits-in-space hypothesis offers the most compelling explanation for the observed grasping behavior with small objects.
  • Maximum grip aperture (MGA) reliability as a measure of object size representation is highly dependent on the specific task and object size.
  • Findings underscore the complex interplay between perception, action, and biomechanics in human grasping.