Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.1K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

882
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
882
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.0K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.0K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

169
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
169
Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

126
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
126

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of roster charts in the investigation and prosecution of nurses suspected of inflicting deliberate harm on patients.

Medicine, science, and the law·2025
Same author

Making sense of breast cancer risk estimates.

Genetic epidemiology·2024
Same author

Testing for Differences in Survival When Treatment Effects Are Persistent, Decaying, or Delayed.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2022
Same journal

The right to die: A comparative analysis of end-of-life issues in Scandinavian legal systems.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Diagnosing autism in adult forensic settings.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Background asbestos fiber levels in autopsy lungs: Implications for forensic disease attribution in the post-ban era.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Changing patterns in volatile substance abuse fatalities: A retrospective case series from Northern Australia.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Integrity, objectivity, and the role of healthcare expert witnesses in the judicial system: An analysis of practice, Indonesian law, and a Foucauldian perspective.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Post-mortem computed tomography findings of spinal column injuries in comparison to autopsy: A systematic review.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K

Suspected serial killers and unsuspected statistical blunders.

John O'Quigley1

  • 1Department of Statistical Science, University College London, UK.

Medicine, Science, and the Law
|April 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical analysis of apparent clusters can be misleading. A careful approach reveals that 10 incidents, when only 2 were expected, may not be a rare event, with a probability near 0.5.

Keywords:
Criminalisticscluster analysisprobabilityserial killersstatistics

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.5K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.5K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.2K

Area of Science:

  • Theoretical Statistics
  • Medical Statistics
  • Legal Statistics

Background:

  • Cluster analysis in statistics aims to differentiate random occurrences from systematic influences.
  • Observed clusters of events, particularly in medicine and law, can trigger investigations.
  • High-profile cases highlight the critical need for accurate statistical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate common statistical errors in interpreting event clusters.
  • To demonstrate how misinterpretations can arise from seemingly rare events.
  • To present a more accurate statistical analysis of clustered incidents.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a hypothetical case with 10 observed incidents against an expected count of 2.
  • Compared a common statistical analysis with a more careful, pitfall-avoiding approach.
  • Calculated probabilities for the observed cluster under different analytical methods.

Main Results:

  • A standard analysis yielded a probability < 0.00005, suggesting an extremely rare event.
  • A refined analysis, avoiding common statistical pitfalls, resulted in a probability close to 0.5.
  • The refined analysis indicated that observing 10 or more incidents was as likely as observing fewer than 10.

Conclusions:

  • Common statistical methods can overestimate the rarity of observed clusters.
  • Careful statistical analysis is crucial to avoid misinterpreting data, especially in sensitive fields like medicine and law.
  • The likelihood of an event cluster depends heavily on the analytical approach used.