Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
Published on: May 8, 2014
The Effect of Prosthetic Limb Sophistication and Amputation Level on Self-reported Mobility and Satisfaction With
Daniel C Norvell1, Alison W Henderson2, David C Morgenroth1
1VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; VA Center for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), Seattle, WA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Objective:
To determine if lower limb prosthesis (LLP) sophistication is associated with patient-reported mobility and/or mobility satisfaction, and if these associations differ by amputation level.
Design:
Cohort study that identified participants through a large national database and prospectively collected self-reported patient outcomes.
Setting:
The Veterans Administration (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse, the National Prosthetics Patient Database, participant mailings, and phone calls.
Participants:
347 Veterans who underwent an incident transtibial (TT) or transfemoral (TF) amputation due to diabetes and/or peripheral artery disease and received a qualifying LLP between March 1, 2018, and November 30, 2020.
Interventions:
Basic, intermediate, and advanced prosthesis sophistication was measured by the accurate and reliable PROClass system.
Main Outcome Measure:
Patient-reported mobility using the advanced mobility subscale of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5; mobility satisfaction using a 0-10-point Likert scale.
Results:
Lower limb amputees who received intermediate or advanced prostheses were more likely to achieve advanced mobility than those who received basic prostheses, with intermediate nearing statistical significance at nearly twice the odds (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI), .98-3.3; P=.06). The association was strongest in TF amputees with over 10 times the odds (aOR=10.2, 95% CI, 1.1-96.8; P=.04). The use of an intermediate sophistication prosthesis relative to a basic prosthesis was significantly associated with mobility satisfaction (adjusted β coefficient (aβ)=.77, 95% CI, .11-1.4; P=.02). A statistically significant association was only observed in those who underwent a TT amputation (aβ=.79, 95% CI, .09-1.5; P=.03).
Conclusions:
Prosthesis sophistication was not associated with achieving advanced mobility in TT amputees but was associated with greater mobility satisfaction. In contrast, prosthesis sophistication was associated with achieving advanced mobility in TF amputees but was not associated with an increase in mobility satisfaction.
Related Concept Videos
02:05Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
01:29Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model