[Screening for cutaneous melanoma: little impact, major challenges]

Routine screening for melanoma has never been shown to be effective. Here, we revisit this debate and the preconceived notion that the increased detection of early-stage melanoma should necessarily be followed within the same population by a reduction in the incidence of advanced stages, which is not supported by any evidence. The issue of overdiagnosis, which has been debated for several decades, is discussed in the light of screening practices. We illustrate with two of its common motives, why this practice is ineffective. Finally, we suggest that the risk of overdiagnosis has probably reached its climax over the last two decades, as the increasing sensitivity of skin-imaging tools has not been followed by a refinement of histopathologic diagnostic criteria.