Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

08:42
Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
10.6K
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening and Reduce Depression Among Low-Income Women.
Jonathan N Tobin1, Elisa S Weiss2, Andrea Cassells1
1Clinical Directors Network (CDN), New York, NY, USA.
Journal of Prevention and Health Promotion
|April 3, 2024
Summary
Both interventions improved cancer screening and depression in underserved women. However, neither approach showed a significant advantage over the other in outcomes for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening or depression reduction.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Clinical Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Low-income women of color face disparities in cancer screening and higher depression rates.
- Depression can significantly hinder participation in crucial cancer screenings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of two interventions for improving cancer screening and reducing depression in underserved women.
- To assess interventions aimed at increasing colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening rates.
- To evaluate the impact on depression levels among women with existing depression.
Main Methods:
- A comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 757 women aged 50-64.
- Participants were randomized to either a collaborative depression care plus cancer screening intervention (CCI + PCM) or a primary care management (PCM) intervention alone.
- Interventions were telephone-based, delivered over 12 months, and assessed using electronic health records and the PHQ-9 for depression.
Main Results:
- Both intervention groups showed statistically significant increases in up-to-date cancer screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancers.
- Depression symptoms improved in both the CCI + PCM and PCM groups.
- No statistically significant differences were found between the two interventions regarding improvements in cancer screening rates or depression reduction.
Conclusions:
- Both collaborative depression care plus cancer screening (CCI + PCM) and primary care management (PCM) interventions effectively improved cancer screening and reduced depression in underserved communities.
- Neither intervention demonstrated a superior advantage in outcomes, suggesting implementation decisions may depend on practice context.
- Further consideration of practice resources and priorities is recommended when selecting between these effective interventions.
Keywords:
cancer screeningcollaborative caredepressionfederally qualified health centers (FQHCs)practice-based research network (PBRN)primary care researchunderserved womenMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K
Longitudinal Research
12.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.0K

