Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ranks01:02

Ranks

236
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
236
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

7.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
7.4K
Mean Absolute Deviation01:13

Mean Absolute Deviation

2.6K
The mean absolute deviation is also a measure of the variability of data in a sample. It is the absolute value of the average difference between the data values and the mean.
Let us consider a dataset containing the number of unsold cupcakes in five shops: 10, 15, 8, 7, and 10. Initially, calculate the sample mean. Then calculate the deviation, or the difference, between each data value and the mean. Next, the absolute values of these deviations are added and divided by the sample size to...
2.6K
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test01:21

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

177
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:
177
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population01:14

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population

127
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the median of a single population is a nonparametric test used to evaluate whether the median of a population differs from a specified value. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require data to follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for non-normal or small samples. The test begins by calculating the difference (d) between each observation and the hypothesized median. The absolute values of these differences are ranked in ascending order, with ties...
127
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

23.6K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
23.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantum Conflict Measurement in Decision Fusion for Out-of-Distribution Detection.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same author

A novel approach employing hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic Einstein aggregation operators within the EDAS approach for multicriteria group decision making.

Heliyon·2024
Same author

Graph-Structure-Based Multigranular Belief Fusion for Human Activity Recognition.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2023
Same author

Making Group Decisions within the Framework of a Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linear Regression Model.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Hesitant 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision-making method based on correlation measures.

PloS one·2022
Same author

The Group Decision-Making Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Entropy and the Complex Proportional Assessment.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

A new distance between rankings.

Jean Dezert1, Andrii Shekhovtsov2, Wojciech Sałabun2

  • 1Department of Information Processing and Systems, The French Aerospace Lab - ONERA, 91120 Palaiseau, France.

Heliyon
|April 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Spearman's footrule distance is not invariant to labeling, posing application challenges. A new, labeling-invariant ranking distance is proposed as a superior alternative, even with weighted rankings.

Keywords:
DistanceF-distanceFrobenius' distanceKemeny's distanceRankingSpearman's distance

More Related Videos

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations
07:45

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations

Published on: September 28, 2018

6.4K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations
07:45

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations

Published on: September 28, 2018

6.4K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Information Science

Background:

  • Spearman's footrule distance (F-distance) is commonly used to measure differences between rankings.
  • The F-distance's lack of invariance to object labeling limits its practical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the labeling dependency of the F-distance.
  • To introduce a novel ranking distance metric that is invariant to labeling.
  • To provide a robust alternative to existing ranking distance measures.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the properties of the Spearman's footrule distance.
  • Development of a new distance metric for rankings.
  • Demonstration of invariance to indexing (labeling).
  • Incorporation of importance weights into the new distance metric.

Main Results:

  • The F-distance was shown to be sensitive to labeling, a significant drawback.
  • A new ranking distance metric, invariant under indexing, was successfully developed.
  • The proposed metric offers an improvement over the F-distance and Kemeny's distance in terms of labeling invariance.
  • The new distance metric effectively handles importance weights.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed labeling-invariant ranking distance is a valuable alternative for applications where object labeling varies.
  • This new metric enhances the reliability and applicability of ranking comparisons in diverse scenarios.
  • The method's adaptability with importance weights further broadens its utility.