Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Contextual Factors Relevant to Implementing Social Risk Factor Screening and Referrals in Cancer Survivorship: A
Joseph A Astorino1, Mandi L Pratt-Chapman1, Laura Schubel2
1The George Washington Cancer Center, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Oncology teams recognize social risks impact cancer survivors, but lack systematic screening and referral processes. Improving electronic health records and community partnerships is key for effective support.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Services Research
- Social Determinants of Health
Background:
- Social risk factors like food insecurity and transportation barriers significantly impact patient health outcomes.
- Implementation of screening and referral for social risk factors remains limited in clinical settings, especially within cancer survivorship care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the current practices and challenges of screening and referring cancer patients for social risk factors within oncology settings.
- To identify barriers and facilitators for implementing systematic social risk factor interventions in cancer survivorship.
Main Methods:
- Conducted 18 qualitative, semistructured interviews with oncology teams across 3 health systems.
- Utilized the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework to guide analysis.
- Employed thematic analysis on interview transcripts to identify key themes and patterns.
Main Results:
- Participating health systems lacked standardized cancer survivorship programs and electronic health record (EHR)-based processes for identifying survivors or documenting social risks.
- Oncology teams acknowledged the impact of social risk factors but did not have systematic processes for screening or referral.
- Recommendations included designating specific staff roles, enhancing EHR data tracking, and improving community organization resource management.
Conclusions:
- Complex cancer care workflows and inadequate reimbursement hinder the ability of clinic staff to address social risk factors.
- Flexible, tailored clinical workflows and improved communication with community-based organizations are crucial for successful screening and referral program implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Preventive Healthcare Services
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Longitudinal Research
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...

