Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Evaluation of Stem Cell Therapies in a Bilateral Patellar Tendon Injury Model in Rats
Published on: March 30, 2018
Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells may be a viable treatment modality in cerebral palsy
Osman Boyalı1, Serdar Kabatas2,3, Erdinç Civelek2
1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34360, Turkey. drosmanboyali@gmail.com.
Background:
Cerebral palsy (CP) describes a group of disorders affecting movement, balance, and posture. Disturbances in motor functions constitute the main body of CP symptoms. These symptoms surface in early childhood and patients are affected for the rest of their lives. Currently, treatment involves various pharmacotherapies for different types of CP, including antiepileptics for epilepsy and Botox A for focal spasticity. However, none of these methods can provide full symptom relief. This has prompted researchers to look for new treatment modalities, one of which is mesenchymal stem cell therapy (MSCT). Despite being a promising tool and offering a wide array of possibilities, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) still need to be investigated for their efficacy and safety.
Aim:
To analyze the efficacy and safety of MSCT in CP patients.
Methods:
Our sample consists of four CP patients who cannot stand or walk without external support. All of these cases received allogeneic MSCT six times as 1 × 106/kg intrathecally, intravenously, and intramuscularly using umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSC). We monitored and assessed the patients pre- and post-treatment using the Wee Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and Manual Ability Classification Scale (MACS) instruments. We utilized the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to measure spasticity.
Results:
We found significant improvements in MAS scores after the intervention on both sides. Two months: Right χ2 = 4000, P = 0.046, left χ2 = 4000, P = 0.046; four months: Right χ2 = 4000, P = 0.046, left χ2 = 4000, P = 0.046; 12 months: Right χ2 = 4000, P = 0.046, left χ2 = 4000, P = 0.046. However, there was no significant difference in motor functions based on WeeFIM results (P > 0.05). GMFCS and MACS scores differed significantly at 12 months after the intervention (P = 0.046, P = 0.046). Finally, there was no significant change in cognitive functions (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
In light of our findings, we believe that UC-MSC therapy has a positive effect on spasticity, and it partially improves motor functions.
More Related Videos
11:22Treatment of Osteochondral Defects in the Rabbit's Knee Joint by Implantation of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Fibrin Clots
Published on: May 21, 2013
09:19High Throughput Characterization of Adult Stem Cells Engineered for Delivery of Therapeutic Factors for Neuroprotective Strategies
Published on: January 4, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Stem Cell Therapy for Tissue Regeneration
Types of Stem Cells used in Stem Cell Therapy
The two main cell...
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic...
iPS Cell Differentiation