Safety and efficacy of remimazolam versus propofol during EUS: a multicenter randomized controlled study

Jung Wan Choe1, Moon Jae Chung2, Se Woo Park3

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Remimazolam offers a safer and more effective sedation option compared to propofol for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures. This novel agent resulted in fewer cardiorespiratory adverse events and improved patient and endoscopist satisfaction.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Anesthesiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Propofol is a common sedative for GI endoscopy but causes cardiorespiratory suppression.
  • Remimazolam is a new ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine with rapid onset and minimal cardiorespiratory effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam versus propofol for sedation during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures.
  • To evaluate cardiorespiratory adverse events, sedation quality, and patient/endoscopist satisfaction.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter randomized controlled study involving 400 patients undergoing EUS.
  • Patients received either remimazolam or propofol.
  • Primary endpoint: cardiorespiratory adverse events; Secondary endpoints: sedation/recovery times, pain, satisfaction.

Main Results:

  • Remimazolam group had significantly fewer cardiorespiratory adverse events (8.5% vs. 16%, P=.022).
  • Remimazolam showed a shorter induction time, comparable recovery, less injection site pain, and higher sedation quality and satisfaction scores.
  • Trends toward less desaturation, respiratory depression, and hypotension were observed with remimazolam.

Conclusions:

  • Remimazolam is superior to propofol for safety and efficacy in EUS sedation.
  • Remimazolam presents a favorable alternative for procedural sedation, enhancing patient and provider experience.