Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

A Protocol for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Rats using Linear Staplers
Published on: August 21, 2021
The Association of Weight With Surgical Morbidity in Infants Undergoing Enterostomy Reversal: A Study of the
Rachael Belcher1, Taylor Kolosky1, James T Moore2
1University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Insights
Neonatal enterostomy closure (EC) weight cutoffs do not impact post-operative complications. This study found no significant difference in major morbidity for infants under 2.5 kg compared to those above this threshold, suggesting weight is not a priority factor.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Neonatal Care
- Surgical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Enterostomy closure (EC) in neonates typically uses a 2.0-2.5 kg weight cutoff.
- The impact of this weight criterion on post-operative morbidity remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between infant weight at EC and 30-day post-operative complications.
- To evaluate if current weight cutoffs for EC influence patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1692 neonates undergoing EC from the 2012-2019 ACS NSQIP-P database.
- Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess outcomes.
- Controlled for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, nutritional, and ventilator support.
Main Results:
- Neonates <2.5 kg at EC were more likely to be premature and require ventilatory support.
- Major morbidity occurred in 16.7% of infants.
- No significant difference in major morbidity was found between infants weighing <2.5 kg and those weighing ≥2.5 kg.
Conclusions:
- Evidence does not support a specific weight cutoff for neonatal EC to reduce major morbidity.
- Infant weight should not be a primary factor in determining eligibility for EC.
- Findings suggest a re-evaluation of current EC weight criteria is warranted.
Introduction:
Optimal criteria and timing for enterostomy closure (EC) in neonates is largely based on clinical progression and adequate weight, with most institutions using 2.0-2.5 kg as the minimum acceptable weight. It is unclear how the current weight cutoff affects post-operative morbidity.
Aim:
To determine how infant weight at the time of EC influences 30-day complications.
Methods:
Infants weighing ≤4000 g who underwent EC were identified in the 2012-2019 ACS NSQIP-P database. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day outcomes were assessed using univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for ASA score, nutritional support, and ventilator support was used to estimate the independent association of weight on risk of 30-day complications.
Results:
A total of 1692 neonates from the NSQIP-P database during the years 2012-2019 met inclusion criteria. Neonates weighing <2.5 kg were significantly more likely to have a younger gestational age, require ventilator support, and have concurrent comorbidities. Major morbidity, a composite outcome of the individual postoperative complications, was observed in 283 (16.7%) infants. ASA classifications 4 and 5, dependence on nutritional support, and ventilator support were independently associated with increased risk of 30-day complications. With respect to weight, we found no significant difference in major morbidity between infants weighing <2.5 kg and infants weighing ≥2.5 kg.
Conclusion:
Despite using a robust, national dataset, we could find no evidence that a defined weight cut-off was associated with a reduction in major morbidity, indicating that weight should not be a priority factor when determining eligibility for neonatal EC.
Level Of Evidence:
III.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...

