Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity
Published on: August 21, 2015
Consolidated guidance for behavioral intervention pilot and feasibility studies
Christopher D Pfledderer1,2, Lauren von Klinggraeff3, Sarah Burkart3
1Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, TX, 78701, USA. christopher.d.pfledderer@uth.tmc.edu.
This study consolidates guidance for pilot and/or feasibility studies (PFS) in behavioral science. It provides 20 key considerations to improve the design, conduct, and reporting of future research.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Sciences
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Pilot and/or feasibility studies (PFS) are crucial for informing larger trials in behavioral science.
- Existing guidance on PFS is fragmented across over 160 publications, making comprehensive understanding difficult for researchers.
- A need exists for a consolidated resource to guide the multifaceted aspects of PFS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a unified set of considerations for the design, conduct, implementation, and reporting of PFS in behavioral science.
- To synthesize existing guidance and expert consensus into a practical resource for researchers.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review identified 161 relevant PFS guidelines, checklists, frameworks, and recommendations.
- A three-round Delphi study was conducted with authors of PFS guidance to achieve expert consensus.
- The review and Delphi process informed the generation of a consolidated list of considerations.
Main Results:
- Twenty key considerations for PFS were developed, categorized into six themes: intervention design, study design, trial conduct, intervention implementation, statistical analysis, and reporting.
- A comprehensive list of 161 publications was cross-referenced with each consideration.
- The findings provide a structured approach to PFS planning and execution.
Conclusions:
- Expert consensus distilled extensive literature into a universal resource for PFS in behavioral science.
- This consolidated guidance aims to improve the quality and impact of PFS.
- Researchers can utilize these considerations to enhance the design and reporting of interventions, ultimately increasing public health impact.
More Related Videos
08:42A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...