Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

55.3K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

301
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
301
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

60.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.4K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

282
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
282
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

400
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
400
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modulating Electron Conducting Properties at Lithium Anode Interfaces for Durable Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2022
Same author

Coadministration of CD19- and CD22-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Childhood B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase II Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2022
Same author

Development of a flat-field-response, four-channel x-ray imaging instrument for hotspot asymmetry studies.

The Review of scientific instruments·2022
Same author

A Prognostic Nomogram Based on Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes to Predict Overall Survival for Non-Metastatic Bladder Cancer Patients after Radical Cystectomy.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2022
Same author

Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography, a powerful method for the evaluation of anthracyclines induced left ventricular insufficiency.

Medicine·2022
Same author

Discovery and optimization of 4-anilinoquinazoline derivatives spanning ATP binding site and allosteric site as effective EGFR-C797S inhibitors.

European journal of medicinal chemistry·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K

Enhancing Narrative Commonsense Reasoning With Multilevel Causal Knowledge.

Feiteng Mu, Wenjie Li

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |April 8, 2024
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a novel two-stage approach to enhance narrative understanding by integrating both sentence-level and event-level causalities. This method improves commonsense reasoning in complex narratives.

    More Related Videos

    Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
    12:55

    Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

    Published on: September 27, 2020

    8.4K
    The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
    05:15

    The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

    Published on: February 19, 2018

    10.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
    05:48

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

    Published on: June 12, 2020

    5.7K
    Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
    12:55

    Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

    Published on: September 27, 2020

    8.4K
    The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
    05:15

    The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

    Published on: February 19, 2018

    10.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Natural Language Processing
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Computational Linguistics

    Background:

    • Narrative understanding relies on causality, which exists at both event and sentence levels.
    • Prior research has focused on either sentence-level or event-level causality, limiting comprehensive narrative comprehension.
    • Effective narrative commonsense reasoning requires integrating diverse causal information.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a two-stage framework that leverages both sentence-level and event-level causalities for enhanced narrative understanding.
    • To address the challenge of event sparsity in capturing causal semantics within narratives.
    • To improve narrative commonsense reasoning capabilities through a hierarchical knowledge graph.

    Main Methods:

    • A two-stage approach was devised: first, injecting sentence-level causalities into pretrained language models (PLMs) via posttraining tasks.
    • Second, refining narrative commonsense reasoning using event causalities, addressing event sparsity by breaking down events into word components to capture word-word relations.
    • Constructing a hierarchical knowledge graph (KG) using event-level causalities and word-level relations, followed by a KG-based reasoning process.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed framework effectively integrates sentence-level and event-level causal relationships.
    • The method successfully alleviates the event sparsity problem by utilizing word-level relations.
    • Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in narrative commonsense reasoning.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed two-stage approach offers a comprehensive method for exploiting multi-level causalities in narratives.
    • Integrating sentence and event causalities, along with word-level relations, enhances commonsense reasoning.
    • The hierarchical knowledge graph provides a robust knowledge ground for advanced narrative understanding.