Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex links abstract planning to motor execution.

Communications biology·2026

Same author

Us and them: Anticipated imitation between groups.

Acta psychologica·2026

Same author

The interference effect of direct eye gaze in the Stroop paradigm.

Acta psychologica·2026

Same author

Adaptive variability in humans, pigeons, and rats.

Psychological review·2026

Same author

Steering through task uncertainty: Evidence for activation modulation over dynamic binding.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same author

Shared effects of one's own and others' experiences during reinforcement learning on episodic memory.

NPJ science of learning·2026

Same journal

Corrigendum to "Productivity matters for the neural processing of novel words, but not existing ones" Cognition Volume 274 (2026) 106593.

Cognition·2026

Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026

Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026

Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026

Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026

Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Dynamic changes in task preparation in a multi-task environment: The task transformation paradigm.

Mengqiao Chai¹, Clay B Holroyd¹, Marcel Brass²

¹Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

|April 10, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Humans can adjust their task preparation and decision-making when facing task uncertainty. This flexibility allows for dynamic modulation of cognitive processes, especially when anticipating task switches.

Keywords:

Cognitive flexibility Control dynamics Task preparation Task switching Uncertainty

More Related Videos

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human Behavior

Background:

Flexible behavior requires predicting and preparing for task or action changes.
Understanding dynamic modulation of cognitive preparation under uncertainty is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if humans can dynamically adjust task preparation and decision-making when task identity is uncertain.
To explore how task uncertainty influences cognitive control and preparation strategies.

Main Methods:

Developed a novel paradigm requiring participants to prepare for one of nine tasks.
Introduced task shifts after a cue-target interval, altering stimulus category or categorization rule.
Conducted experiments to analyze behavioral modulations and expectancy effects.

Main Results:

Participants dynamically modulated task preparation in response to task uncertainty.
Behavioral changes were linked to increased switch expectancy, not just decreased task expectancy.
Dynamic modulations were compositional, adapting to changes in stimulus category or categorization rule independently.

Conclusions:

Human cognitive systems exhibit dynamic flexibility in task preparation and decision-making under uncertainty.
Anticipation of task switches, rather than mere expectation decay, drives these adaptive behaviors.
Cognitive control mechanisms can compositionally adapt to specific components of task changes.