Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Us and them: Anticipated imitation between groups
Maximilian Marschner1, Carl Michael Galang2, Marcel Brass2
1Department of Psychology, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.
Acta Psychologica
|May 28, 2026
Summary
Group imitation dynamics influence social interactions. People
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Imitation research typically focuses on two-person interactions.
- Group dynamics in imitation are less understood.
- Understanding group imitation is crucial for complex social settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate how group interactions modulate anticipated imitation effects.
- Examine imitation in a virtual environment with multiple agents.
- Determine the role of group-level congruency in social tasks.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed an anticipated imitation task in a virtual reality setting.
- The study involved a virtual co-actor and two virtual agents from an opposing dyad.
- Manipulation of imitation by one or both opposing agents and presence/absence of a co-actor.
Main Results:
- Group-level congruency effects on task performance were partially observed.
- Facilitation occurred when acting with a co-actor if both opposing agents imitated.
- The opposite trend emerged when acting without a co-actor, with effects moderated by response speed.
Conclusions:
- Anticipated responses from multiple partners causally influence individual contributions in social interactions.
- Joint task representations can encode actions at a group level.
- This study extends imitation research beyond dyadic interactions into group contexts.
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Nonconscious Mimicry
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Social Proof
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Conformity
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
Impact of Groups on Groups
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...

