Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

5.1K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.1K
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

122
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
122
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals01:30

Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals

261
The actions and characteristics of others heavily influence the causes of social behaviors. Emotional expressions serve as powerful social signals, shaping behaviors and interactions in significant ways. Whether through direct observation or subconscious processing, individuals constantly adjust their responses based on the emotions and attributes of those around them.Emotional Cues and Social ResponsesFacial expressions, tone of voice, and body language provide crucial emotional cues that...
261
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

845
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
845
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

560
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
560
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation01:27

Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation

1.1K
Clark Hull's drive-reduction theory, introduced in the 1940s and 1950s and often termed the "push theory" of motivation, provides a framework for understanding how biological and learned drives influence behavior. Hull suggested that motivation originates from the need to alleviate physiological tension caused by unmet biological necessities. The theory proposes that when a basic need, such as hunger or sleep, goes unfulfilled, it creates an internal imbalance. This imbalance, or...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Us and them: Anticipated imitation between groups.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Bindings for Action: Bridging the Gap Between Theories of Procedural Working Memory and Action Control Research.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Task-order control in dual-tasks: Only marginal interactions between conflict at lower levels and higher processes of task organization.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same author

Me or we? Action-outcome learning in synchronous joint action.

Cognition·2024
Same author

Communication and action predictability: two complementary strategies for successful cooperation.

Royal Society open science·2022
Same author

Binding Error-Induced Control States.

Journal of cognition·2022
Same journal

Orthographic Neighbourhood Size Effects in Chinese Character Recognition: Small, Inconsistent, and Theoretically Ambiguous.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

The Role of Different Thoughts in Tacit Coordination and Its Malleability by Interventions.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Prior Beliefs about Volatility on Adaptive Behavior.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Proactive Control of Emotional Information in Adult ADHD.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowledge Gap Illustrations Spark Curiosity.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Centre-of-Mass Confounds Contribute to Familiar Size Stroop Effects with Boger and Firestone's 'Visual Anagrams'.

Journal of cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.3K

Do Individual and Joint Action Goals Modulate Imitative Response Tendencies?

Maximilian Marschner1, Günther Knoblich1, David Dignath2

  • 1Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.

Journal of Cognition
|January 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding social imitation requires examining how individual and joint goals influence action. This study reveals that individual action goals primarily drive imitation, even when participants pursue joint tasks, suggesting domain-general control processes.

Keywords:
Action GoalsAction ObservationImitationJoint ActionSocial Interaction

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.6K
A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
11:14

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.3K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.6K
A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
11:14

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Neuroscience
  • Human Interaction

Background:

  • Coordinated social interaction relies on modulating imitative tendencies.
  • Goal representations (high-level outcomes vs. low-level movements) influence imitation.
  • The interplay between different goal levels in shaping imitation remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how individual and joint action goals interact.
  • Examine the influence of goal representation levels on imitative congruency.
  • Determine the impact of task instructions (individual vs. joint goals) on imitation.

Main Methods:

  • Two online experiments were conducted.
  • Participants interacted with a virtual co-actor, selecting action targets.
  • Imitative congruency was manipulated at both individual action goal and low-level movement goal levels.

Main Results:

  • Task performance was primarily driven by imitative congruency in individual action goals.
  • Individual action goal congruency modulated the effects of low-level movement goal congruency.
  • Imitation effects persisted irrespective of whether participants pursued individual or joint task goals.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support goal-directed theories of imitation.
  • Modulations in imitative tendencies may arise from domain-general action planning and control.
  • Instructions for joint goals had limited impact on imitation in interactive contexts.