Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

353
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
353
Average Acceleration01:30

Average Acceleration

9.6K
The importance of understanding acceleration spans our day-to-day experiences, as well as the vast reaches of outer space and the tiny world of subatomic physics. In everyday conversation, to accelerate means to speed up. For instance, we are familiar with the acceleration of our car; the harder we apply our foot to the gas pedal, the faster we accelerate. The greater the acceleration, the greater the change in velocity over a given time. Acceleration is widely seen in experimental physics. In...
9.6K
Instantaneous Acceleration01:16

Instantaneous Acceleration

7.7K
Acceleration is in the direction of the change in velocity, but it is not always in the direction of motion. When an object slows down, its acceleration is opposite to the direction of its motion. Although commonly referred to as deceleration, this causes confusion in our analysis as deceleration is not a vector, and does not point to a specific direction with respect to a coordinate system. Therefore, the term deceleration is not used. For example, when a subway train slows down, it...
7.7K
Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface01:20

Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface

2.4K
An object's apparent weight is its weight measured by a spring balance at its location. It is different from its true weight, the force with which the Earth pulls it, because of the Earth's rotation. Mathematically, an object's apparent weight equals its true weight minus the centripetal force that keeps it in a circular motion along with the Earth's surface every 24 hours.
The difference between the true and apparent weights is proportional to the square of the Earth's...
2.4K
Acceleration Vectors01:30

Acceleration Vectors

8.0K
In everyday conversation, accelerating means speeding up. Acceleration is a vector in the same direction as the change in velocity, Δv, therefore the greater the acceleration, the greater the change in velocity over a given time. Since velocity is a vector, it can change in magnitude, direction, or both. Thus acceleration is a change in speed or direction, or both. For example, if a runner traveling at 10 km/h due east slows to a stop, reverses direction, and continues their run at 10 km/h...
8.0K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

333
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
333

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experts' ability to predict the future fosters unwarranted optimistic expectations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same author

Impact of statins on short and long term mortality in severe community acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Predictive Lung- and Spleen-Targeted mRNA Delivery with Biodegradable Ionizable Lipids in Four-Component LNPs.

Pharmaceutics·2025
Same author

Psychosocial factors that predict happiness: A multigroup path analysis.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Design and validation of an instrument to evaluate Person-Centered care in health services.

Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique·2024
Same author

Positive Mental Health Questionnaire (PMHQ) for Healthcare Workers: A Psychometric Evaluation.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K

Acceleration neglect in trend extrapolations.

Massimiliano Ostinelli1, David Luna2

  • 1Department of Marketing, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|April 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary

People often underestimate how unexpected events can change trends, like climate change. This cognitive bias, related to momentum and physics understanding, impacts predictions and decision-making.

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Climate Science Communication

Background:

  • Decisions frequently rely on trend predictions from time series data.
  • Unexpected events can significantly accelerate or decelerate trends, necessitating prediction revisions.
  • Examples include climate change, stock market fluctuations, and disease spread.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and describe a novel cognitive bias: the neglect of trend acceleration/deceleration due to unexpected events.
  • To explain this bias through the lens of momentum theory and intuitive physics understanding.
  • To highlight the implications of this bias for communication strategies in various domains.

Main Methods:

  • The study likely involved experimental designs to test predictions about trend changes.
  • Analysis may have focused on how participants account for external factors influencing time series.
  • Theoretical explanation grounded in momentum and naive physics principles.

Main Results:

  • A consistent cognitive bias was observed where individuals underestimate the impact of unexpected events on trend dynamics.
  • This neglect affects the accuracy of future predictions based on current trends.
  • The bias is linked to a simplified, intuitive understanding of physical principles like momentum.

Conclusions:

  • Individuals exhibit a bias in predicting trend changes, specifically neglecting the potential for acceleration or deceleration.
  • This cognitive tendency has significant implications for risk assessment and policy communication, particularly concerning climate change.
  • Understanding this bias is crucial for improving how information about dynamic systems is conveyed to the public and policymakers.