Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

567
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
567
Anatomy of the Eyeball01:20

Anatomy of the Eyeball

7.1K
The eye is a spherical, hollow structure composed of three tissue layers. The outer layer — the fibrous tunic, comprises the sclera — a white structure — and the cornea, which is transparent. The sclera encompasses some of the ocular surface, most of which is not visible. However, the 'white of the eye' is distinctively visible in humans compared to other species. The cornea, a clear covering at the front of the eye, enables light penetration. The eye's middle...
7.1K
Vision01:24

Vision

53.2K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
53.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simultaneous enhancement of stimulus-induced and stimulus-free gamma in open-eye meditators.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Burst estimation through atomic decomposition (BEAD): A toolbox to find oscillatory bursts in brain signals.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Delayed Accumulation of Inhibitory Input Explains Gamma Frequency Variation with Changing Contrast in an Inhibition Stabilized Network.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Dissociation of Attentional State and Behavioral Outcome Using Local Field Potentials.

eNeuro·2024
Same author

Gamma Responses to Colored Natural Stimuli Can Be Predicted from Local Low-Level Stimulus Features.

eNeuro·2024
Same author

Alpha and SSVEP power outperform gamma power in capturing attentional modulation in human EEG.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2023
Same journal

Translational profiling of Drd2-expressing populations reveals molecular heterogeneity of dentate gyrus mossy cells along the dorsoventral axis.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Movement Disorder Patients with Depression have Altered Corticostriatal Alpha-Beta Power Response to Reward and Loss.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Ocular speech tracking persists in blindness, but its dynamics and oculo-cerebral connectivity depend on visual status.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Emergent multidien cycles from partial circadian synchrony.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Adolescent social isolation induces persistent impairments in emotional discrimination and helping behavior.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Increased Ih Current Is Associated with Reduced Hippocampal CA1 Excitability in a Mouse Model of Multiple Sclerosis.

eNeuro·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.0K

Auditory and Visual Gratings Elicit Distinct Gamma Responses.

Divya Gulati1, Supratim Ray2

  • 1Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, India.

Eneuro
|April 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Auditory ripples did not generate narrowband gamma oscillations like visual gratings. Instead, they produced broadband high-gamma activity and suppressed beta band brain waves, suggesting different neural processing strategies.

Keywords:
EEGauditorygammagratingshigh-gammavisual

More Related Videos

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.3K
Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

12.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.0K
Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.3K
Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats
10:30

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

12.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing
  • Brain Oscillations

Background:

  • High-frequency brain activity (>30 Hz), including gamma band oscillations (30-70 Hz) and high-gamma activity (70-150 Hz), accompanies sensory stimulation.
  • Narrowband gamma oscillations, evoked by visual stimuli like gratings, show potential as biomarkers, declining with aging and Alzheimer's disease.
  • Visual stimuli require head stabilization for eye tracking, making an auditory equivalent desirable for easier stimulus delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if auditory ripple stimuli, analogous to visual gratings, can elicit narrowband gamma oscillations in auditory brain regions.
  • To compare brain responses to visual gratings and auditory ripples to understand cross-modal stimulus processing similarities and differences.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded 64-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) from 36 participants (18 male, 18 female).
  • Presented participants with static visual gratings or stationary/moving auditory ripples via loudspeakers.
  • Monitored brain activity during visual stimulation (eyes open) and auditory stimulation (eyes open or closed).

Main Results:

  • Visual gratings successfully induced narrowband gamma oscillations and alpha band suppression (8-12 Hz).
  • Auditory ripples did not elicit narrowband gamma oscillations.
  • Auditory ripples strongly evoked broadband high-gamma activity and induced beta band suppression (14-26 Hz).

Conclusions:

  • The brain processes visual and auditory stimuli differently, even when using analogous stimuli.
  • Auditory ripple stimuli evoke broadband high-gamma activity, not narrowband gamma oscillations, indicating distinct neural circuitry engagement.
  • Neuronal processing strategies for sensory input may not be universally shared across different sensory modalities.