Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Can cognitive dissonance explain beliefs regarding meritocracy?
1Department of Social Sciences, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, Spain.
Economically disadvantaged individuals may perceive inequality as fair, not due to meritocracy, but when they lack control over their circumstances, leading to a fatalistic outlook.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Justice Studies
Background:
- Economically disadvantaged populations often perceive inequality as fair.
- Meritocracy, where fairness is tied to effort and input, is a common explanation.
- However, real-world uncertainty in income and merit distribution complicates this.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate why disadvantaged individuals legitimize their disadvantage.
- To test the theory that cognitive dissonance drives the perception of fairness in inequality.
- To explore the role of control in perceptions of economic inequality.
Main Methods:
- An online experiment was conducted to test the cognitive dissonance theory.
- Qualitative data analysis was used to understand the psychological responses to inequality and control.
Main Results:
- The study did not find support for cognitive dissonance as a mechanism for perceiving meritocracy.
- Disadvantaged individuals were more likely to view inequality as fair when they lacked control.
- Deprivation of control was linked to a fatalistic response to inequality.
Conclusions:
- Cognitive dissonance does not appear to be the primary driver for disadvantaged individuals accepting inequality.
- Lack of control, rather than perceived merit, significantly influences the acceptance of inequality.
- A sense of fatalism emerges when individuals feel a deprivation of control.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Fundamental Attribution Error
Confirmation Biases
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification