Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

41
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
41
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.6K
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

144
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
144
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.4K
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

16.0K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.0K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?

F1000Research·2026
Same author

Supporting policy through research funding: how UK funders can use Areas of Research Interest to bridge evidence gaps.

Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice·2026
Same author

Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.

Evaluation & the health professions·2025
Same author

The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme in England: a mixed methods evaluation.

Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice·2025
Same author

Relationship between research activity and the performance of English general practices: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2024
Same author

'It depends': what 86 systematic reviews tell us about what strategies to use to support the use of research in clinical practice.

Implementation science : IS·2024
Same journal

Rethinking qualitative inquiry in implementation science: clarifying purpose, design, and rigor.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Clarifying dissemination outcomes: a taxonomy to advance dissemination science.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of a clinical practice guidelines implementability assessment tool (CPG-IAT) based on the COSMIN framework.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Embracing complexity by reducing rigidity: guiding principles for the intersection of implementation science and qualitative research.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Patterns of CDSS adoption in primary care: a cluster analysis and predictive modelling study from a stepped wedge trial.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Five years of the Implementation Research Logic Model: a citation analysis and systematic scoping review of its use in implementation research and practice.

Implementation science : IS·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

A modified action framework to develop and evaluate academic-policy engagement interventions.

Petra Mäkelä1, Annette Boaz2, Kathryn Oliver3

  • 1Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Kings Cross, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. petra.makela@lshtm.ac.uk.

Implementation Science : IS
|April 12, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A modified SPIRIT framework aids in evaluating academic-policy engagement interventions across diverse sectors. This enhanced tool supports evidence-informed decision-making by guiding the development and assessment of engagement strategies.

Keywords:
Academic-policy engagementEvidence-informed policyFramework modification

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Policy Studies
  • Knowledge Translation
  • Higher Education Research

Background:

  • Existing frameworks often fail to specifically guide evaluations of academic-policy engagement.
  • Bridging the gap between evidence, policy, and practice requires targeted evaluation tools.
  • There is a need for adaptable frameworks beyond health policy contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To modify the SPIRIT (Supporting Policy In Health with Research: an Intervention Trial) framework.
  • To create a framework applicable beyond health policy, encompassing social, environmental, and economic impacts.
  • To address broader dynamics of academic-policy engagement for improved evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Iterative approach involving literature reviews.
  • Consultation with diverse stakeholders from Higher Education Institutions and policy professionals.
  • Application within the Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme evaluation.

Main Results:

  • The modified SPIRIT framework includes a new domain: 'Impacts and Sustainability'.
  • The enhanced framework is purposeful, informed, and guides targeted interventions.
  • It provides a structure for building knowledge on academic-policy engagement.

Conclusions:

  • The modified SPIRIT framework is accessible and meaningful for the evidence-policy ecosystem.
  • It offers potential applications for developing, evaluating, and improving academic-policy engagement interventions.
  • The framework ultimately supports the use of evidence in policy decision-making.