Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

A 3D Organotypic Melanoma Spheroid Skin Model
Published on: May 18, 2018
Targeted DNA Sequencing of Cutaneous Melanoma Identifies Prognostic and Predictive Alterations
Alexandra M Haugh1, Robert C Osorio2,3, Rony A Francois4
1Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94142, USA.
Background:
Cutaneous melanoma (CM) can be molecularly classified into four groups: BRAF mutant, NRAS mutant, NF1 mutant and triple wild-type (TWT) tumors lacking any of these three alterations. In the era of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and targeted molecular therapy, the clinical significance of these groups remains unclear. Here, we integrate targeted DNA sequencing with comprehensive clinical follow-up in CM patients.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study that assessed clinical and molecular features from patients with localized or metastatic CM who underwent targeted next-generation sequencing as part of routine clinical care. A total of 254 patients with CM who had a CLIA-certified targeted sequencing assay performed on their tumor tissue were included.
Results:
Of the 254 patients with cutaneous melanoma, 77 were BRAF mutant (30.3%), 77 were NRAS mutant (30.3%), 47 were NF1 mutant (18.5%), 33 were TWT (13.0%) and the remaining 20 (7.9%) carried mutations in multiple driver genes (BRAF/NRAS/NF1 co-mutated). The majority of this co-mutation group carried mutations in NF1 (n = 19 or 90%) with co-occurring mutations in BRAF or NRAS, often with a weaker oncogenic variant. Consistently, NF1 mutant tumors harbored numerous significantly co-altered genes compared to BRAF or NRAS mutant tumors. The majority of TWT tumors (n = 29, 87.9%) harbor a pathogenic mutation within a known Ras/MAPK signaling pathway component. Of the 154 cases with available TMB data, the median TMB was 20 (range 0.7-266 mutations/Mb). A total of 14 cases (9.1%) were classified as having a low TMB (≤5 mutations/Mb), 64 of 154 (41.6%) had an intermediate TMB (>5 and ≤20 mutations/Mb), 40 of 154 (26.0%) had a high TMB (>20 and ≤50 mutations/Mb) and 36 of 154 (23.4%) were classified as having a very high TMB (>50 mutations/Mb). NRAS mutant melanoma demonstrated significantly decreased overall survival on multivariable analysis (HR for death 2.95, 95% CI 1.13-7.69, p = 0.027, log-rank test) compared with other TCGA molecular subgroups. Of the 116 patients in our cohort with available treatment data, 36 received a combination of dual ICI with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 inhibition as first-line therapy. Elevated TMB was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival following dual-agent ICI (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.90, p = 0.033, log-rank test).
Conclusions:
NRAS mutation in CMs correlated with significantly worse overall survival. Elevated TMB was associated with increased progression-free survival for patients treated with a combination of dual ICI, supporting the potential utility of TMB as a predictive biomarker for ICI response in melanoma.
Insights
NRAS mutations in cutaneous melanoma (CM) are linked to worse survival. High tumor mutational burden (TMB) predicts better progression-free survival with dual immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in CM patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Immunotherapy
Background:
- Cutaneous melanoma (CM) classification includes BRAF, NRAS, NF1 mutations, and triple wild-type (TWT) groups.
- The clinical impact of these molecular subtypes in the context of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) requires further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To integrate targeted DNA sequencing data with clinical outcomes in CM patients.
- To clarify the clinical significance of distinct CM molecular subgroups, particularly in relation to emerging therapies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 254 CM patients undergoing targeted next-generation sequencing.
- Analysis of clinical and molecular features, including mutations in BRAF, NRAS, NF1, and tumor mutational burden (TMB).
Main Results:
- NRAS-mutant CM showed significantly worse overall survival compared to other molecular subgroups.
- Elevated TMB was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival in patients receiving dual ICI therapy (anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1).
- NF1-mutant tumors exhibited more co-altered genes compared to BRAF or NRAS mutant tumors, and most TWT tumors had Ras/MAPK pathway mutations.
Conclusions:
- NRAS mutation is a negative prognostic factor for overall survival in CM.
- Tumor mutational burden (TMB) may serve as a predictive biomarker for response to dual immune checkpoint inhibition in melanoma.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...

