Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Experimental Procedure for Warm Spinning of Cast Aluminum Components
Published on: February 1, 2017
Modelling the Flow Behaviour of Al Alloy Sheets at Elevated Temperatures Using a Modified Zerilli-Armstrong Model and
Ali Abd El-Aty1,2, Yong Xu3, Yong Hou4
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering at Al Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Predicting the flow behavior of AA2060 aluminum alloy during hot deformation is complex. The S2-MJC constitutive model accurately predicts flow stress by linking strain rate, strain hardening, and softening mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Mechanical Engineering
- Metallurgy
Background:
- The flow behavior of AA2060 Al alloy under warm/hot deformation is complex, influenced by strain rate, strain, and deformation modes.
- Accurate prediction of this behavior across a wide range of temperatures and strain rates is crucial for material processing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reveal and predict the warm/hot deformation flow behaviors of AA2060 Al alloy sheet.
- To develop and compare constitutive models for precise flow stress prediction under varying conditions.
Main Methods:
- Isothermal tensile tests were conducted using a Gleeble-3800 thermomechanical simulator at temperatures from 100-500 °C and strain rates from 0.01-10 s⁻¹.
- Three phenomenological models (L-MJC, S1-MJC, S2-MJC) and a physically based modified Zerilli-Armstrong (MZA) model were developed.
- Model predictability was assessed using statistical parameters: correlation coefficient (R), average absolute relative error (AARE), and root mean square error (RMSE).
Main Results:
- The S2-MJC model demonstrated the closest alignment between predicted and experimental stresses, outperforming S1-MJC, L-MJC, and MZA models.
- Statistical analysis confirmed the superior accuracy of the S2-MJC model.
- The enhanced predictability of S2-MJC is attributed to its effective linking of softening, strain rate, and strain hardening.
Conclusions:
- The S2-MJC constitutive model provides a highly accurate prediction of AA2060 Al alloy flow behavior under warm/hot deformation.
- The model's success stems from its ability to correlate dynamic recovery and softening mechanisms with strain, strain rate, and temperature.
- This research offers a reliable tool for predicting and optimizing the processing of AA2060 Al alloy.
Related Concept Videos
Temperature Dependent Deformation
Stress-Strain Diagram - Ductile Materials
Plastic Behavior
Thermal expansion and Thermal stress: Problem Solving
To solve the problem, first, identify the known and unknown quantities. The initial length (L) of the bridge is 1275 m, the coefficient of linear expansion (α) for steel is 12 x 10-6/°C, and the change in...
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
Fatigue

