Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025
Exosomal miRNA Analysis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC Patients' Plasma Through qPCR: A Feasible Liquid Biopsy Tool
Published on: May 27, 2016
Comprehensive analysis of exosome gene LYPD3 and prognosis/immune cell infiltration in lung cancer
Tao Xin1, Chunlong Zheng2, Gui-Zhen Li2
1Department of Respiratory, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Background:
Lung cancer (LC) is a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide, with high incidence and mortality rates. Ly6/PLAUR domain containing 3 (LYPD3) is a tumorigenic and highly glycosylated cell surface protein that has been rarely reported in LC. This study aimed to explore the prognostic role and immune cell infiltration of LYPD3 in LC.
Methods:
We used ExoCarta, a database of exosomal proteins and RNA, to select exosomes in LC. The Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) and Human Protein Atlas (HPA) databases were utilized to compare the expression of LYPD3 in LC. We applied Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 (GEPIA2) and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plotter to evaluate the prognostic prediction performance of LYPD3. Biological processes (BPs), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) analyses were performed to illustrate the possible role of LYPD3 in LC. The correlations between LYPD3 and immune cell infiltration were explored using Tumor and Immune System Interaction Database (TISIDB), GEPIA2, and TIMER. R software was used for statistical analysis and mapping.
Results:
A total of 904 exosome molecules were screened in LC. Further analysis showed that the up-regulation of LYPD3 in these 904 exosome molecules was associated with poor prognosis in LC. Pan-cancer analyses revealed that the expression of LYPD3 varied in many cancers, particularly in LC. Clinical correlation analysis indicated that LYPD3 was associated with stage and T classification in LC. We observed that LYPD3 co-expression genes were associated with cell cycle, DNA replication, proteasome, and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton by GSEA. Moreover, LYPD3 was associated with immune modulators. Immunophenoscores (IPS) and IPS-CTLA4 were significantly different between the high LYPD3 group and low LYPD3 group. Additionally, the median half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of bexarotene, cyclopamine, etoposide, and paclitaxel in LYPD3 high group was significantly lower than that in LYPD3 low group.
Conclusions:
LYPD3 is involved in many BPs of LC, such as regulating immune cell infiltration and affecting prognosis. Therefore, LYPD3 may have potential value as a biomarker for prognosis and immunotherapy in LC.
