Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Intermolecular Forces03:13

Intermolecular Forces

Atoms and molecules interact through bonds (or forces): intramolecular and intermolecular. The forces are electrostatic as they arise from interactions (attractive or repulsive) between charged species (permanent, partial, or temporary charges) and exist with varying strengths between ions, polar, nonpolar, and neutral molecules. The different types of intermolecular forces are ion–dipole, dipole–dipole, hydrogen bonds, and dispersion; among these, dipole–dipole, hydrogen bonds, and dispersion...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhanced Surface-Engineering Properties of Nanocrystalline Ceramic Coatings for Thermal Spray Applications.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Comprehensive dataset on macro-porous PVDF flat sheet membranes for membrane distillation: Materials characteristics, morphology and performance data.

Data in brief·2026
Same author

Nanobubbles of Oxygen, Air, and Ozone Gas for the Degradation of Reactive and Cationic Dyes from Wastewater.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2025
Same author

Solvent Effect on Antimicrobial Hydrophilic Xerogel Coating of Medicinal Leathers in Simulated Industrial Finishing Process.

ChemPlusChem·2025
Same author

High-Purity Ethylene Production from Ethane/Ethylene Mixtures at Ambient Conditions by Ethane-Selective Fluorine-Doped Activated Carbon Adsorbents.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
Same author

Exploring the Effect of Ionic Liquid Conformation on the Selective CO<sub>2</sub> Capture of Supported Ionic Liquid-Phase Adsorbents Based on ZIFs.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Automated Lipid Bilayer Membrane Formation Using a Polydimethylsiloxane Thin Film
08:23

Automated Lipid Bilayer Membrane Formation Using a Polydimethylsiloxane Thin Film

Published on: July 10, 2016

18.3K

Formation of Polyimide Membranes via Non-Solvent Induced Phase Separation: Insight from Molecular Dynamics

George V Theodorakopoulos1, Dionysios S Karousos1, Evangelos P Favvas1

  • 1Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, NCSR Demokritos, Athens, Greece.

Chempluschem
|April 16, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Molecular dynamics simulations explored polyimide membrane formation using n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and a greener solvent, γ-butyrolactone (GBL). Both solvents yielded similar porous structures, with GBL showing slightly narrower pore distributions, impacting surface wettability.

Keywords:
non-solvent induced phase separationpore size distributionporous polymersspecific surface area

More Related Videos

Self-assembling Morphologies Obtained from Helical Polycarbodiimide Copolymers and Their Triazole Derivatives
09:22

Self-assembling Morphologies Obtained from Helical Polycarbodiimide Copolymers and Their Triazole Derivatives

Published on: February 7, 2017

7.8K
Electrophoretic Crystallization of Ultrathin High-performance Metal-organic Framework Membranes
07:45

Electrophoretic Crystallization of Ultrathin High-performance Metal-organic Framework Membranes

Published on: August 16, 2018

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Automated Lipid Bilayer Membrane Formation Using a Polydimethylsiloxane Thin Film
08:23

Automated Lipid Bilayer Membrane Formation Using a Polydimethylsiloxane Thin Film

Published on: July 10, 2016

18.3K
Self-assembling Morphologies Obtained from Helical Polycarbodiimide Copolymers and Their Triazole Derivatives
09:22

Self-assembling Morphologies Obtained from Helical Polycarbodiimide Copolymers and Their Triazole Derivatives

Published on: February 7, 2017

7.8K
Electrophoretic Crystallization of Ultrathin High-performance Metal-organic Framework Membranes
07:45

Electrophoretic Crystallization of Ultrathin High-performance Metal-organic Framework Membranes

Published on: August 16, 2018

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Polymer Chemistry
  • Chemical Engineering

Background:

  • Polyimide membranes are crucial for separation processes.
  • Non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) is a key fabrication method.
  • Investigating greener solvents is essential for sustainable materials development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate P84 polyimide membrane formation via NIPS using both conventional (NMP) and greener (GBL) solvents.
  • To compare the morphological characteristics and surface properties of membranes formed from these different solvent systems.
  • To understand the influence of polymer concentration and solvent choice on membrane structure and wettability.

Main Methods:

  • Molecular dynamics simulations were employed to model the phase separation process.
  • Polymer solutions were prepared at compositions along the binodal boundaries determined from experimental cloud point data.
  • Membrane morphology was analyzed, and surface wettability was assessed.
  • Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) analysis was used to characterize the nanostructure surface area.

Main Results:

  • Both NMP and GBL systems successfully formed porous polyimide membranes.
  • Membrane morphology was qualitatively similar between the two solvent systems.
  • Surface wettability correlated with polymer content and BET specific surface area.
  • GBL-derived membranes exhibited slightly narrower pore size distributions compared to NMP-derived ones.

Conclusions:

  • GBL is a viable greener alternative to NMP for fabricating P84 polyimide membranes with comparable porous structures.
  • Polymer concentration significantly influences membrane surface wettability.
  • The NIPS process, simulated via molecular dynamics, offers insights into controlling membrane morphology and properties.