Entrustment Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit: It's About More Than the Learner

The provision of graded supervision affording progressive autonomy is fundamental to the progression of a medical learner toward competency for independent practice; the decision of how much supervision versus autonomy to provide a trainee in the execution of clinical care constitutes an entrustment decision. Despite entrustment decision making occurring both daily in practice and summatively at points of matriculation through stages of medical training, the factors influencing entrustment decisions remain poorly understood across clinical contexts.

This study was designed to explore the central research question: How are entrustment decisions made in the medical intensive care unit (ICU)?

This qualitative case study used semistructured interviews with attending pulmonary and critical care physicians in the medical ICU at a major midwestern medical center to explore the entrustment decision-making process as it was enacted in the clinical environment.

Five major themes emerged from the data: 1) task, circumstance, and trainee factors contribute to entrustment decision making; 2) ad hoc entrustment decisions are enacted by supervisors with a consideration of the care team as a unit, not only an individual; 3) autonomy does not only arise out of entrustment, but outcomes of prior autonomous actions by the trainee inform the intention to entrust; 4) entrustment decision making includes a social process of back-and-forth akin to negotiation; and 5) entrustment is a learned skill.

The process of entrustment decision making in the ICU is more complex than prior frameworks have captured; a model with more complete incorporation of the factors that influence entrustment in the ICU is presented. It is not clear how often ad hoc entrustment decisions in clinical practice are primarily driven by factors pertaining directly to trainee competence, which carries implications in the use of entrustment for assessment.