Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Recoverability and estimation of causal effects under typical multivariable missingness mechanisms
Jiaxin Zhang1,2, S Ghazaleh Dashti1,2, John B Carlin1,2
1Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Recovering the average causal effect (ACE) with missing data depends on missingness assumptions, visualized in missingness directed acyclic graphs (m-DAGs). Multiple imputation methods can provide unbiased ACE estimates, except in specific scenarios requiring sensitivity analyses.
Area of Science:
- Causal inference
- Missing data methods
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Identifiability of average causal effect (ACE) relies on causal and missingness assumptions.
- Missingness directed acyclic graphs (m-DAGs) visualize missingness mechanisms.
- Prior work on ACE recoverability excluded effect modification and estimation methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- Extend research on ACE recoverability to settings with effect modification.
- Evaluate performance of missing data methods for ACE estimation using g-computation.
- Investigate ACE estimation in the context of canonical missingness mechanisms.
Main Methods:
- Determined ACE recoverability in settings with effect modification.
- Conducted simulation study evaluating complete case analysis (CCA) and multiple imputation (MI).
- Used correctly specified g-computation for ACE estimation in simulations based on the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study (VAHCS).
Main Results:
- ACE is recoverable if no variable (exposure, outcome, confounder) causes its own missingness, excluding unmeasured confounders of missingness indicators.
- Multiple imputation (MI) methods compatible with g-computation yielded approximately unbiased ACE estimates across most canonical m-DAGs.
- Exceptions for MI include when the outcome causes its own missingness or the missingness of a variable that causes its own missingness.
Conclusions:
- ACE recoverability is contingent on specific missingness assumptions within m-DAGs.
- Compatible MI methods offer robust ACE estimation, but sensitivity analyses may be needed in challenging missingness scenarios.
- Findings have practical implications for causal effect estimation in observational studies with missing data.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
06:52Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
Published on: September 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Causality in Epidemiology
Censoring Survival Data
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach