Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Executive functioning in children with ADHD Investigating the cross-method correlations between performance tests and
Kristoffer Dalsgaard Olsen1, Denis Sukhodolsky2, Aida Bikic3
1Child and Youth Psychiatric outpatient clinic, Region of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.
This study found no significant correlations between cognitive tests and rating scales for evaluating executive functions (EF) in children with ADHD. Results suggest different methods may measure distinct EF constructs, impacting clinical expectations.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Child Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Executive functions (EF) are crucial for cognitive control and behavior regulation.
- Previous research indicates weak or non-significant correlations between different EF assessment methods.
- Children with ADHD often exhibit executive dysfunction, necessitating reliable assessment tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between executive function rating scales and cognitive tests in children with ADHD.
- To determine if parent-reported executive function behaviors align with objective cognitive test performance.
- To explore potential discrepancies in EF assessment across different methodologies.
Main Methods:
- 139 children (aged 6-13) diagnosed with ADHD and executive dysfunction participated.
- Cognitive assessment using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).
- Parental rating scales included the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and Children's Organizational Skills Scale (COSS).
Main Results:
- No significant correlations were found between composite scores of cognitive tests and rating scales.
- One significant negative correlation (r=-.25, p<.01) was observed between specific subscales.
- Significant cross-method differences emerged when stratified by ADHD subtype, particularly for the inattentive subtype.
Conclusions:
- Different methods may assess distinct underlying constructs of executive functions.
- Responder bias and ecological validity differences may influence measurement outcomes.
- Future research should focus on ecologically valid EF testing and rating scales capturing behavior over cognition.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Correlations