Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

345
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
345

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retargeted serine integrases for one-step, precise integration of large DNA sequences in human cells.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same author

International Delphi consensus on single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: patient selection, surgical technique, and training.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Effect of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with equivocal or clinically high-risk non-suspicious findings on multiparametric MRI (PRIMARY2): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Unmasking the unexpected: a rare case of rheumatic heart disease.

Cardiology in the young·2026
Same author

The Performance of Prognostic Measures for Survival in Spinal Metastatic Disease in Light of Modern Advancements in Medical and Surgical Management.

Spine·2026
Same author

A 2-Year Analysis of Peer Tutoring in Dental Education: Enhancing Student Learning and Developing a Faculty Pathway.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same journal

Patient-Reported Symptom Burden Among Thyroid Cancer Survivors: Retrospective Cohort Study.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

Rule-Based Algorithm to Identify Recurrent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Electronic Health Data.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

Bayesian Methods for Subgroup Efficacy and Safety: Application to Japanese Patients in JAVELIN Renal 101.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

Effect of a Multidimensional Digital Health Intervention on Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

Can Small Open-Source Language Models With Retrieval-Augmented Generation Match GPT-4 Performance in Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support?

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
Same journal

Machine Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Tumor Microsatellite Instability Based on Multiomics Biomarkers.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K

Explainable Machine Learning Model to Preoperatively Predict Postoperative Complications in Inpatients With Cancer

Matthew C Hernandez1, Chen Chen2, Andrew Nguyen3

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.

JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
|April 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

An explainable machine learning model accurately predicts postoperative complications (CD 3+) in cancer patients undergoing major surgery. This tool utilizes electronic health records to identify high-risk individuals, improving patient care and surgical outcomes.

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

261

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

261

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Predicting postoperative complications (PCs) in cancer patients undergoing major surgery is complex.
  • Existing methods often lack precision and explainability for heterogeneous patient populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model for predicting 30-day postoperative complications (CD 3+) in cancer inpatients.
  • To identify key predictive features using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 988 operations in 827 cancer inpatients (December 2017 - June 2021).
  • Development and testing of an ML model using electronic health record (EHR) data.
  • Performance evaluation using AUROC, AUPRC, and calibration plots; SHAP for model interpretability.

Main Results:

  • The ML model achieved an AUROC of 0.77 (training) and 0.73 (holdout) and AUPRC of 0.56 (training) and 0.52 (holdout) for predicting CD 3+ complications.
  • The complication rate was 28.6% (training) and 27.5% (holdout).
  • SHAP analysis identified key risk factors and their contributions at individual and cohort levels.

Conclusions:

  • An explainable ML model can accurately predict the risk of severe postoperative complications in cancer patients.
  • The model leverages patient-specific EHR data for risk stratification.
  • Explainability features enhance clinical utility by highlighting critical predictive factors.