Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frequency-specific BERA in infants.

M L Hyde

    The Journal of Otolaryngology. Supplement
    |February 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Click Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response (BERA) has limitations for infant hearing assessment. Place-specific BERA using tonepip stimuli offers potential improvements for early audiological evaluation in infants.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Reasonable psychometric standards for self-report outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation.

    Ear and hearing·2000
    Same author

    Effects of monensin on the metabolism of periparturient dairy cows.

    Journal of dairy science·1997
    Same author

    Decision and cost analysis in acoustic neuroma diagnosis.

    The Journal of otolaryngology·1994
    Same author

    Relationship between locomotor forces, hoof position and joint motion during the support phase of the stride of galloping horses.

    Acta anatomica·1993
    Same author

    Unilateral otosclerosis and noise-induced occupational hearing loss.

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·1991
    Same author

    ABR latency in infants: properties and applications of various measures.

    Acta oto-laryngologica·1991
    Same journal

    Unilateral nasal resistance and asymmetrical body pressure.

    The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement·1986
    Same journal

    Cartilage delivery and open rhinoplasty as two preferred approaches to the nasal tip.

    The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement·1986
    Same journal

    Normative aspects of the pediatric auditory brainstem response.

    The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement·1985
    Same journal

    Comparison of auditory brainstem response and behavioral screening in neonates.

    The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement·1985
    Same journal

    Auditory brainstem response audiometry in neonatal hydrocephalus.

    The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement·1985
    Same journal

    Neurological aspects of infant hearing assessment.

    The Journal of otolaryngology. Supplement·1985
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Neuroscience
    • Pediatrics

    Background:

    • Click Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response (BERA) is a common audiological assessment for infants.
    • However, click BERA has significant limitations in assessing specific hearing frequencies and contours.
    • These limitations hinder comprehensive early audiological evaluation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review methods of cochlear place-specific BERA.
    • To detail BERA using tonepip stimuli in band-reject masking noise for infant assessment.
    • To outline technical and normative considerations for these methods.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of cochlear place-specific BERA techniques.
    • Detailed description of BERA with tonepip stimuli and band-reject masking noise.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in infants.
  • Main Results:

    • Most infants show clear ABRs to 40 dBnHL tonepips.
    • Threshold distributions are broader at 500 Hz compared to higher frequencies.
    • Infant hearing thresholds improve within the first four months, particularly at 500 Hz.

    Conclusions:

    • Place-specific BERA testing, particularly with tonepips, shows promise for early infant audiological assessment.
    • It may offer advantages over click BERA for identifying specific hearing loss.
    • Further research is necessary to establish its full limitations and clinical relevance.