Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
Published on: August 13, 2012
Northern Nevada Public Health: Utilizing the Public Health Workforce Calculator and Workforce Capacity
Leslie M Beitsch1, Matthew Stefanak, Carol Moehrle
1Center for Medicine and Public Health, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida (Dr Beitsch); Kent State University College of Public Health, Kent, Ohio (Mr Stefanak); Public Health-Idaho North Central District, Lewiston, Idaho (Ms Moehrle); Northern Nevada Public Health, Reno, Nevada (Mr Dick); and Public Health Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia (Mr Bialek).
The Public Health Workforce Calculator and self-assessment tools effectively identified staffing gaps for Foundational Public Health Services (FPHS). This structured approach supports investment planning and funding requests for essential public health workforce needs.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
- Workforce Development
Background:
- National understaffing and infrastructure deficits challenge public health departments.
- Assessing current staffing against Foundational Public Health Services (FPHS) provides a framework for investment justification.
- Northern Nevada Public Health (NNPH) sought to evaluate its workforce capacity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the Public Health Workforce Calculator and complementary tools for identifying and prioritizing FPHS workforce needs in a practical setting.
- To assess the utility of these tools for guiding public health workforce investments.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a field application of the Public Health Workforce Calculator alongside FPHS workforce capacity self-assessment tools.
- Collaborated with Northern Nevada Public Health (NNPH) from June 2022 to April 2023.
- Compared calculator outputs with self-assessment data to identify workforce capacity gaps.
Main Results:
- The calculator and self-assessment tools generated complementary data on FPHS workforce capacity gaps.
- A structured, transparent process with prioritization tools proved effective for public health workforce investment planning.
- NNPH successfully used the findings to support funding requests and appropriations.
Conclusions:
- Utilizing the Public Health Workforce Calculator and FPHS self-assessment within a facilitated process can effectively identify staffing priorities.
- This approach shows promise for supporting decision-making and justifying infrastructure resource allocation for public health.
- The methodology offers a viable strategy for future public health funding increases.
More Related Videos
09:34Applications of Spatio-temporal Mapping and Particle Analysis Techniques to Quantify Intracellular Ca2+ Signaling In Situ
Published on: January 7, 2019
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Current Trends in Nursing I
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...