Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

94
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
94
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.7K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

198
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
198
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Analysis of composite traditional Chinese medicine constitution: an investigation of 974 volunteers].

Zhong xi yi jie he xue bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine·2012
Same author

XM: association testing on the X-chromosome in case-control samples with related individuals.

Genetic epidemiology·2012
Same author

[New progress of study on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes].

Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi·2012
Same author

A study on voiding pattern of newborns with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

Urology·2012
Same author

Effects of 1,1,1-trichloroethane on enzymatic activity and bacterial community in anaerobic microcosm form sequencing batch reactors.

Ecotoxicology (London, England)·2012
Same author

Effect of silicon and sodium on thermoelectric properties of thallium-doped lead telluride-based materials.

Nano letters·2012
Same journal

Proficiency order invariance of MLE, MAP, EAP, and WLE in item response theory.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Bias and precision in true-score estimation.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Polychoric correlations under the assumption of elliptical latent traits.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Regularized reduced rank regression for mixed predictor and response variables.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

A multiple-choice SDT model for cognitive diagnosis models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Modular item response and structural equation modelling via measurement and uncertainty preserving parametric modelling.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

503

Advances in meta-analysis: A unifying modelling framework with measurement error correction.

Betsy Jane Becker1, Qian Zhang2

  • 1Synthesis Research Group, Roswell, Georgia, USA.

The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
|April 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a unified model for multivariate meta-analysis, incorporating measurement error corrections for standardized mean differences (d) and correlations (r) to improve psychological research replicability.

Keywords:
attenuationcorrelationgeneralized least squaresmeasurement error correctionmultivariate meta‐analysisstandardized mean difference

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

70.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

503
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

70.7K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Multivariate outcomes are common in psychological studies, leading to dependent effects.
  • Multivariate meta-analysis estimates mean effects and variance-covariance matrices from primary studies.
  • Measurement error can impact the accuracy of meta-analytic findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a unified modeling framework for multivariate meta-analysis.
  • To incorporate measurement error corrections into this framework.
  • To enhance the replicability of psychological research by addressing measurement error.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on standardized mean differences (d) and correlations (r) as common effect sizes.
  • Utilize generalized least squares estimation.
  • Outline estimated mean vectors and variance-covariance matrices corrected for measurement error.

Main Results:

  • A unified modeling framework for multivariate meta-analysis with measurement error correction is presented.
  • The framework provides corrected estimates for mean vectors and variance-covariance matrices for standardized mean differences and correlations.
  • The approach addresses the often-overlooked impact of measurement error in psychological research.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing measurement error is crucial in multivariate meta-analysis.
  • The proposed framework enhances the accuracy and replicability of psychological research findings.
  • This unified approach is vital given the increasing use of multivariate outcomes in psychological studies.