Risk factors for post-operative portal vein stenosis in pediatric liver transplantation: a single center case-control

Yigang Qian1,2, Wei Zhang1,2, Weili Wang1,2

  • 1Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

PubMed

Insights

Post-transplant portal vein stenosis (PVS) is a concern in pediatric liver transplants. Cryopreserved vein grafts and young liver donors increase PVS risk.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Transplantation Surgery
  • Pediatric Surgery

Background:

  • Post-transplant portal vein stenosis (PVS) is more common in pediatric liver transplantation (LT).
  • Various portal vein (PV) reconstruction techniques may influence PVS incidence.
  • Identifying risk factors is crucial for improving outcomes in pediatric LT.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the incidence of PVS in pediatric LT recipients.
  • To analyze the association between different PV reconstruction methods and PVS.
  • To identify other potential risk factors for PVS in this population.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 332 pediatric patients (<12 years at LT) was analyzed.
  • PV reconstruction methods included: anastomosis to recipient PV trunk (Type 1), recipient PV branch patch (Type 2), vein graft interposition (Type 3), and end-to-end anastomosis (Type 4).
  • Incidence of PVS was correlated with PV reconstruction types and donor age.

Main Results:

  • PVS occurred in 35 (10.5%) patients.
  • Among patients receiving vein grafts, 55% (11/20) with cryopreserved grafts developed PVS, versus 0% (0/12) with fresh iliac vein grafts.
  • PVS developed in 18.8% (9/48) of patients who received livers from donors under 12 years old.

Conclusions:

  • Cryopreserved vein graft interposition is an independent risk factor for PVS.
  • Receiving a liver from a donor under 12 years old is also an independent risk factor for PVS.
  • These findings highlight specific risks in pediatric LT that warrant careful consideration during surgical planning and donor selection.
Abstract