Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Do students' self-reflections of performance align with their graded performance in objective structured clinical
Angelina S Lim1, Sunanthiny Krishnan2, George Tan3
1Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Pharmacy students’ self-reflections on objective structured clinical exams (OSCE) poorly align with their actual scores. This misalignment is most significant in high-achieving students, indicating a need for targeted feedback to boost confidence.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Pharmacy Education
- Self-Reflection Analysis
Background:
- Self-awareness of strengths and weaknesses is crucial for lifelong learning and professional development.
- Accurate self-assessment of performance is vital for identifying areas needing improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the alignment between third-year undergraduate pharmacy students' self-reflections and their objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) scores.
- To identify common themes students focused on in their self-reflections as indicators of performance.
Main Methods:
- Students (n=269) completed a three-station OSCE and a written self-reflection.
- Reflections were analyzed using latent pattern content analysis, categorizing performance as "doing well (≥50%)" or "not doing well (<50%)".
- Self-reflection categories were compared against actual OSCE scores to determine alignment.
Main Results:
- A low degree of alignment was observed between students' self-reflections and their actual OSCE performance.
- This misalignment was particularly pronounced in high-achieving students scoring ≥90% on the OSCE.
- Common reflection points included time management and communication; high-achievers also noted empathy, systematic questioning, and patient teach-back.
Conclusions:
- Student self-reflections on OSCE performance do not accurately reflect their actual results, especially for high-achievers.
- High-achieving students demonstrate greater awareness of performance factors but may lack confidence.
- Educators should implement targeted feedback and reassurance to enhance high-achievers' confidence in their decision-making skills.
More Related Videos
00:08A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Metacognition
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nursing Evaluation
Patient-centered Care