Optimizing catheter centering enhances mechanical thrombectomy success: Performance difference in cases using novel...

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to determine how guidewire selection impacts procedure time and success and analyze if the trend toward the adoption of larger diameter guidewires provides a quantifiable advantage over traditional 0.014″ guidewires.MethodsA review of 494 consecutively performed acute ischemic stroke cases performed between 2018 and 2022 were reviewed and grouped into cases using a single 0.014″ outer diameter (OD) guidewire (195 cases) and cases using a single 0.018″ or 0.024″ OD guidewire (128 cases). These groups were compared for differences in average time to recanalization, average number of passes to achieve recanalization, and first pass success. Cases were compared overall, and further analyzed by region of occlusion to look at specific guidewire related differences for cases with M1, M2, and ICA occlusions.ResultsProcedures using a larger OD guidewire have an average 5 min and 30 s reduction in time from puncture to recanalization (p = 0.0201). ICA occlusion cases using a larger macrowire show a 20 min reduction in recanalization time (p = 0.0005), a reduction in average number of passes from 2.6 to 1.7 (p = 0.0058), and an increase in first pass success from 18.8% to 58.3% when compared to traditional guidewires.ConclusionLarge 0.018″ or 0.024″ OD guidewires better fill the lumen of the catheter and help to center the thrombectomy system in the vessel and navigate to the clot face. This leads to a reduction in procedure time and number of passes, and an increase in first pass success, especially when treating occlusions in the ICA.