Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Fabrication, Operation and Flow Visualization in Surface-acoustic-wave-driven Acoustic-counterflow Microfluidics
Published on: August 27, 2013
Comparison of a thickness-tapered channel in flow field-flow fractionation with a conventional channel with flow rate
Young Beom Kim1, Jaihoo Kim1, P Stephen Williams2
1Department of Chemistry, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea.
Abstract:
The thickness-tapered channel structure in flow field-flow fractionation (FlFFF), recently introduced by constructing a channel with a linear decrease in thickness along its length, demonstrated effectiveness in steric/hyperlayer separation of supramicron particles with improvements in separation speed, elution recovery, and an expanded dynamic size range of separation. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the performance between the impact of field (or crossflow rate) programming or outflow rate programming for the separation of polystyrene latex standards (50 ∼ 800 nm) with a conventional channel having uniform thickness and a thickness-tapered channel without programming. Outlet flow rate and crossflow rate conditions were also varied. Although the particle size resolution of the tapered channel does not surpass that of field programming in uniform thickness channel, it achieves higher-speed separation without a significant loss of resolution and without the need for a complex flow controller system even at a low outflow rate condition. Furthermore, it yielded an improved resolution for particles close to the steric transition regime (400 ∼ 600 nm) in the normal mode of separation. Due to the continuous increase in mean flow velocity down the channel, the tapered channel exhibits flexibility in separating submicron-sized particles at high crossflow rate conditions or low outflow rate conditions, of which the latter can be advantageous when coupled with mass spectrometry in a miniaturized setup.
Related Concept Videos
Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving
Uniform Depth Channel Flow
Rapidly Varying Flow
Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates
Gradually Varying Flow
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel

