Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
Resource Utilization and Risk Factors for Esophageal Injury in Pediatric Esophageal Foreign Bodies
Basil Hashimi1, Amber D Shaffer2, Jennifer L McCoy3
1University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Insights
Pediatric esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) in asymptomatic patients did not cause injury, suggesting outpatient management could improve care value. This approach may reduce hospital charges associated with EFB removal.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Otolaryngology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Management protocols for pediatric esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) exist but can be optimized for resource utilization.
- Understanding patient risk factors for esophageal injury is crucial for effective management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze hospital charges and costs for pediatric patients with EFBs.
- To identify patient-specific risk factors associated with esophageal injury in pediatric EFB cases.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients undergoing aerodigestive foreign body removal (2018-2021).
- Data included demographics, medical history, symptoms, EFB type, surgical findings, and hospital charges/costs.
- Statistical analysis to identify risk factors for esophageal injury and cost drivers.
Main Results:
- 203 pediatric patients were included; 87.7% required admission.
- Unwitnessed ingestion, prolonged symptoms (>1 week), dysphagia, respiratory distress, coughing, decreased oral intake, fever, and congestion increased odds of esophageal injury.
- Asymptomatic patients (n=51) showed no esophageal injury.
- Median total charges were $20,808, with operating room (28.2%) and inpatient admission (26.0%) being the highest cost contributors.
Conclusions:
- Asymptomatic pediatric patients with EFBs do not experience esophageal injury.
- Operating room time and inpatient observation represent the largest components of hospital charges.
- Developing an algorithm to triage asymptomatic patients for same-day outpatient management could enhance the value of care.
Objective:
While management protocols of pediatric esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) are well-delineated, resource utilization can be improved. This study's objectives were to explore hospital charges/costs for pediatric patients who present with EFBs and to identify patient risk factors associated with esophageal injury.
Methods:
A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing aerodigestive foreign body removal at a tertiary-care children's hospital from 2018 to 2021 was conducted. Data collected included demographics, medical history, presenting symptoms, EFB type, surgical findings, and hospital visit charges/costs.
Results:
203 patients were included. 178 of 203 (87.7%) patients were admitted prior to operation. Unwitnessed EFB ingestion (p < 0.001, OR = 15.1, 95% CI = 5.88-38.6), experiencing symptoms for longer than a week (p < 0.001, OR = 11.4, 95% CI = 3.66-38.6) and the following presenting symptoms increased the odds of esophageal injury: dysphagia (p = 0.04, OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.02-5.85), respiratory distress (p = 0.005, OR = 15.5, 95% CI = 2.09-181), coughing (p < 0.001, OR = 10.1, 95% CI = 3.73-28.2), decreased oral intake (p = 0.001, OR = 6.60, 95% CI = 2.49-17.7), fever (p = 0.001, OR = 5.52, 95% CI = 1.46-19.6), and congestion (p = 0.001, OR = 8.15, 95% CI = 2.42-27.3). None of the 51 asymptomatic patients had esophageal injury. The median total charges during the encounter was $20,808 (interquartile range: $18,636-$24,252), with operating room (OR) (median: $5,396; 28.2%) and inpatient admission (median: $5,520; 26.0%) contributing the greatest percentage.
Conclusions:
Asymptomatic patients with EFBs did not experience esophageal injury. The OR and inpatient observation accounted for the greatest percentage of the hospital charges. These results support developing a potential algorithm to triage asymptomatic patients to be managed on a same-day outpatient basis to improve the value of care.
Level Of Evidence:
3 Laryngoscope, 134:4774-4782, 2024.
More Related Videos
10:15Conditional Reprogramming of Pediatric Human Esophageal Epithelial Cells for Use in Tissue Engineering and Disease Investigation
Published on: March 22, 2017
06:25Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...