Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

06:46
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
256
Outcomes Following a False-Positive Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test: Results from DETECT-A, the First Large,
Anne Marie Lennon1, Adam H Buchanan2, Seema P Rego3
1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cancer Prevention Research (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|May 5, 2024
Summary
Women with false positive results from a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood test had a low risk of developing cancer. Further investigation using imaging confirmed no cancer, and long-term follow-up showed a low incidence rate of new cancers.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Diagnostics
- Cancer Screening
Background:
- Standard of care (SoC) cancer screening covers only four cancer types, missing many cancer-related deaths.
- Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood tests offer potential for broader cancer screening.
- Long-term outcomes for individuals with false positive (FP) MCED results require evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of an imaging-based diagnostic workflow following a positive MCED blood test (CancerSEEK) with no initial cancer diagnosis.
- To evaluate the long-term cancer risk in participants with false positive (FP) MCED results.
- To analyze clinical outcomes and cancer incidence in a cohort with FP results from the DETECT-A trial.
Main Methods:
- Prospective analysis of 98 DETECT-A participants with a positive CancerSEEK test and negative 18-F-FDG PET-CT/contrast-enhanced CT imaging within one year.
- Medical record review, study interactions, and surveys to track cancer incidence, treatments, and outcomes through August 2023.
- Median follow-up of 3.6 years from determination of FP status.
Main Results:
- 95 out of 98 participants (96.9%) with FP results remained cancer-free.
- Three incident cancers (one ovarian, two breast) were diagnosed during the follow-up period.
- The annual incidence rate of cancer post-FP determination was 1.0% (95% CI: 0.2%-2.8%).
Conclusions:
- Participants with a positive MCED test (CancerSEEK) and negative imaging workup have a low risk of developing cancer in the subsequent years.
- The diagnostic workflow involving imaging after a positive MCED test is effective in identifying individuals without cancer.
- This study provides crucial long-term safety data for MCED blood testing in cancer screening.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
291
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Sensitivity is the...
291
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
341
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
341

