Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

16.2K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk factors for high-grade pivot shift in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears combined with lateral meniscus posterior root tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Rice OsTUB1 interacts with OsEB1c and OsEB1a to separately modulate endosperm development and grain size.

Journal of integrative plant biology·2026
Same author

Multi-UAV Cooperative Path Planning Using a Behavior-Adaptive Aquila Optimizer Under Multiple Constraints.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

A Dynamic Multi-Niche Biogeography-Based Optimization Algorithm and Its Application to Robot Path Planning.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Prognostic Value of Biatrial Mechanics in Hypertensive OSA Patients With Preserved Left Ventricular Function: A Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Study.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Nitrogen ion implantation significantly enhances the tribological properties and corrosion resistance of aluminum-lithium alloy.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2025
Same journal

Correction: A method for supervoxel-wise association studies of age and other non-imaging variables from coronary computed tomography angiograms.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Poly(bromophenol blue)/CoSn(OH)<sub>6</sub> cubic particles modified pencil graphite electrode for electrochemical determination of diphenhydramine.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Dietary Chlorella, Spirulina, and acidifier modulate jejunal cytokine-related gene expression in broiler chickens.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Perceived physical activity barriers in university students: associations with fatigue and eating behaviours.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Refuge limitation structures habitat use in agricultural landscapes: evidence from Sunda pangolins.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Lightweight stateless transaction verification with outsourced witness updates for UTXO blockchains.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

49.6K

An improved manta ray foraging optimization algorithm.

Pengju Qu1,2, Qingni Yuan3, Feilong Du1

  • 1Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of the Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.

Scientific Reports
|May 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Improved Manta Ray Foraging Optimization Algorithm (IMRFO) enhances convergence and avoids local optima using chaotic mapping and Levy flight. This improved algorithm demonstrates superior performance in optimization tasks.

Keywords:
Bidirectional search strategyImproved manta ray foraging optimizationLevy flightMetaheuristic

More Related Videos

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish
14:58

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish

Published on: April 6, 2019

7.7K
Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

49.6K
Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish
14:58

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish

Published on: April 6, 2019

7.7K
Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Intelligence
  • Optimization Algorithms
  • Metaheuristics

Background:

  • The Manta Ray Foraging Optimization Algorithm (MRFO) is a metaheuristic approach for complex problem-solving.
  • Existing MRFO methods face challenges with slow convergence and local optima entrapment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce an Improved Manta Ray Foraging Optimization Algorithm (IMRFO).
  • To enhance the convergence speed and global search capability of the MRFO algorithm.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporation of Tent chaotic mapping for improved initial solution quality and uniform distribution.
  • Implementation of a bidirectional search strategy to broaden the exploration range.
  • Integration of Levy flight strategy to enhance the ability to escape local optima.

Main Results:

  • IMRFO was rigorously tested against 10 other algorithms on 23 benchmark functions and CEC2017/2022 suites.
  • Statistical analysis confirmed the significant superiority of IMRFO over competing optimization algorithms.
  • The proposed IMRFO algorithm demonstrated superior performance on five engineering problems.

Conclusions:

  • The IMRFO algorithm effectively overcomes the limitations of the standard MRFO.
  • The enhanced strategies significantly improve optimization performance and solution quality.
  • IMRFO represents a robust and effective advancement in metaheuristic optimization.