Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025
A Method for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Ethanol in Rats without Water Deprivation, Saccharin Fading or Extended Access Training
Published on: January 29, 2017
Topiramate Versus Naltrexone for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Genotype-Stratified Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Kirsten C Morley1, Henry R Kranzler1, Natasha Luquin1
1Specialty of Addiction Medicine, Sydney Medical School (Morley, Adams, Montebello, Tremonti, Dali, Logge, Haber), School of Health Sciences (Baillie), and Matilda Centre for Mental Health and Substance Use (Teesson), Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Edith Collins Centre for Translational Research in Alcohol, Drugs, and Toxicology (Morley, Jamshidi, Logge, Haber) and Department of Medical Genomics (Luquin, Trent), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia; Center for Studies of Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, and Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia (Kranzler); Northern Sydney Local Health District Drug and Alcohol Services, St Leonards, Australia (Montebello); St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia (Tremonti).
Objective:
There have been no well-controlled and well-powered comparative trials of topiramate with other pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder (AUD), such as naltrexone. Moreover, the literature is mixed on the effects of two polymorphisms-rs2832407 (in GRIK1) and rs1799971 (in OPRM1)-on response to topiramate and naltrexone, respectively. The authors sought to examine the comparative effectiveness of topiramate and naltrexone in improving outcomes in AUD and to examine the role of the rs2832407 and rs1799971 polymorphisms, respectively, on response to these medications.
Methods:
In a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multisite, genotype-stratified (rs2832407 and rs1799971) clinical trial comparing topiramate and naltrexone in treating AUD, 147 patients with AUD were randomly assigned to treatment with topiramate or naltrexone, stratified by genotype (rs2832407*CC and *AC/AA genotypes and rs1799971*AA and *AG/GG genotypes). The predefined primary outcome was number of heavy drinking days per week. Predefined secondary outcomes included standard drinks per drinking day per week, body mass index (BMI), craving, markers of liver injury, mood, and adverse events.
Results:
For the number of heavy drinking days per week, there was a near-significant time-by-treatment interaction. For the number of standard drinks per drinking day per week, there was a significant time-by-treatment interaction, which favored topiramate. There were significant time-by-treatment effects, with greater reductions observed with topiramate than naltrexone for BMI, craving, and gamma-glutamyltransferase level. Withdrawal due to side effects occurred in 8% and 5% of the topiramate and naltrexone groups, respectively. Neither polymorphism showed an effect on treatment response.
Conclusions:
Topiramate is at least as effective and safe as the first-line medication, naltrexone, in reducing heavy alcohol consumption, and superior in reducing some clinical outcomes. Neither rs2832407 nor rs1799971 had effects on topiramate and naltrexone treatments, respectively.
More Related Videos
09:29Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
Published on: August 4, 2022
05:40The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
01:27CNS Depressants: Alcohol and Nicotine
01:26Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy