Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Single-cell Suction Recordings from Mouse Cone Photoreceptors
Published on: January 5, 2010
Genetic manipulation of rod-cone differences in mouse retina
Ala Morshedian1, Zhichun Jiang1, Roxana A Radu1
1Department of Ophthalmology and Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
None:
Though rod and cone photoreceptors use similar phototransduction mechanisms, previous model calculations have indicated that the most important differences in their light responses are likely to be differences in amplification of the G-protein cascade, different decay rates of phosphodiesterase (PDE) and pigment phosphorylation, and different rates of turnover of cGMP in darkness. To test this hypothesis, we constructed TrUx;GapOx rods by crossing mice with decreased transduction gain from decreased transducin expression, with mice displaying an increased rate of PDE decay from increased expression of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). These two manipulations brought the sensitivity of TrUx;GapOx rods to within a factor of 2 of WT cone sensitivity, after correcting for outer-segment dimensions. These alterations did not, however, change photoreceptor adaptation: rods continued to show increment saturation though at a higher background intensity. These experiments confirm model calculations that rod responses can mimic some (though not all) of the features of cone responses after only a few changes in the properties of transduction proteins.

