Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026
Application of Lucilia sericata Larvae in Debridement of Pressure Wounds in Outpatient Settings
Published on: December 4, 2021
Randomized comparative study of negative pressure wound therapy versus compression dressing on split-thickness skin
Vivien Moris1, Sarra Cristofari2, Leslie Ann See1
1Service chirurgie maxillo-faciale, plastique-reconstructrice et esthétique, chirurgie de la main, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Introduction:
Failure to adequately secure the skin graft to the lower limbs recipient bed can result in loss of the graft. Our objective was to compare the healing of split-thickness skin grafts three weeks postoperatively, using either negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or conventional compression bandaging.
Methods:
In this multicenter randomized controlled study, patients with tissue loss ranging from 50 cm2 to 600 cm2 on the lower limbs and treated with split-thickness skin grafts were included in three French hospitals. A digital photographic evaluation was performed at 3 weeks.
Results:
During 9 years, 70 patients were included in the study and allocated to a treatment group. The grafted area was similar in both groups. Loss of graft was significantly reduced in the NPWT group with 14.6 cm2 compared to 29 cm2 in the control group (p = 0.0003). The hospital stay was also significantly reduced in the NPWT group, at 4 days versus 6.5 days in the control group (p = 0.0284). In the NPWT group, 60% reported pain compared to 22.9% in the control group (p = 0.0048).
Conclusions:
The use of NPWT dressings improves skin graft take by reducing necrosis, improving the graft's adherence to the recipient site, and reducing hospital length-of-stay.
