Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

516
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
516
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

681
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
681
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.3K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.1K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

551
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
551
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Compilation of Creep Property Data for Nuclear Structural Materials.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Machine learning-based correlation of charpy impact properties between sub-sized and standard-sized specimens for nuclear structural materials.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

From Capture-Recapture to No Recapture: Efficient SCAD Even After Software Updates.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

GCSAM: Gradient Centralized Sharpness Aware Minimization.

IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions·2025
Same author

Automated Skin Cancer Report Generation via a Knowledge-Distilled Vision-Language Model.

IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions·2025
Same author

Interpretable Graph Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Multi-Cancer Classification and Biomarker Identification using Multi-Omics Data.

ArXiv·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.9K

Uncertainty quantification in multivariable regression for material property prediction with Bayesian neural

Longze Li1, Jiang Chang1, Aleksandar Vakanski2

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Idaho Falls, ID, 83404, USA.

Scientific Reports
|May 8, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Physics-informed Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) offer reliable uncertainty quantification for material property prediction. This approach, validated for steel creep life, outperforms conventional methods and enhances active learning strategies.

Keywords:
Active learningBayesian neural networksCreep lifePhysics-informed machine learningUncertainty quantification

More Related Videos

O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression
06:50

O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression

Published on: November 8, 2019

6.6K
Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
08:47

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.9K
O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression
06:50

O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression

Published on: November 8, 2019

6.6K
Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
08:47

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Computational Materials Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Data-driven methods and machine learning are increasingly vital in materials science.
  • Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is crucial for informed decision-making in material property prediction.
  • Challenges in UQ for materials include multi-scale physics, complex interactions, and limited data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel physics-informed Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) approach for UQ in material science.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of this BNNs approach for predicting creep rupture life in steel alloys.
  • To assess the performance of UQ in active learning scenarios for materials prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a physics-informed Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) framework integrating material governing laws.
  • Applied the BNNs approach to predict creep rupture life using three experimental steel alloy datasets.
  • Compared BNNs performance against Gaussian Process Regression and other neural network variants.

Main Results:

  • The physics-informed BNNs approach demonstrated competitive or superior point predictions and uncertainty estimations compared to conventional UQ methods.
  • The BNNs framework showed promising performance in active learning scenarios for materials prediction.
  • Bayesian Neural Networks utilizing Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approximation yielded more reliable results than variational inference approximations.

Conclusions:

  • Physics-informed BNNs provide a robust framework for uncertainty quantification in material property prediction.
  • The MCMC-based BNNs approach is particularly effective for accurate and reliable creep life prediction.
  • This methodology enhances the utility of machine learning in materials science by providing trustworthy predictions and uncertainty estimates.