Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Purification of Native Complexes for Structural Study Using a Tandem Affinity Tag Method
Published on: July 27, 2016
Bulk lysis procedures alter target cell population counts.
Laura G Rico1, Roser Salvia1, Michael D Ward2
1Functional Cytomics Lab, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona (Barcelona), Spain.
Bulk lysis (BL) assays for high-sensitivity cell analysis, like measurable residual disease (MRD) detection, cause significant cell loss. Minimal sample perturbation (MSP) protocols preserve more cells, improving rare cell detection accuracy in flow cytometry.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Immunology
- Cellular Biology
Background:
- High-sensitivity cell measurements (<1 in 10^5 cells) by flow cytometry (FCM) require analyzing millions of cells, particularly for measurable residual disease (MRD) detection.
- Conventional immunophenotyping protocols and bulk lysis (BL) assays often fail to acquire sufficient cell numbers and can lead to significant cell loss.
- Minimal sample perturbation (MSP) protocols are proposed to better preserve cellular integrity and avoid cell loss during sample preparation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the efficacy of bulk lysis (BL) protocols against minimal sample perturbation (MSP) protocols for high-sensitivity cell analysis.
- To assess the impact of BL protocols on cell counts, particularly for rare cell populations like those in MRD detection.
Main Methods:
- An MRD model was created by spiking peripheral blood with known percentages of EGFP-expressing K562 cells.
- Samples were processed using both bulk lysis (BL) and minimal sample perturbation (MSP) protocols.
- Flow cytometry (FCM) was used to analyze and compare cell populations between the two protocols.
Main Results:
- A significant decrease in K562 cell populations was observed in BL samples compared to MSP samples across all tested percentages.
- Bulk lysis (BL) protocols resulted in significant loss of non-necrotic cells relative to MSP protocols.
- These findings indicate potential over- or under-estimation of rare target cells when using BL methods.
Conclusions:
- Bulk lysis (BL) protocols significantly reduce cell counts, impacting the accuracy of high-sensitivity measurements, especially for rare cells in MRD detection.
- Minimal sample perturbation (MSP) protocols demonstrate superior cell recovery and preservation compared to BL methods.
- Improvements in bulk lysis reagents and solutions are necessary to enhance cell recovery and ensure accurate quantification for high-sensitivity FCM applications.
More Related Videos
09:45Escherichia coli-Based Cell-Free Protein Synthesis: Protocols for a robust, flexible, and accessible platform technology
Published on: February 25, 2019
03:59Production and Optimization of LTE, a Leishmania tarentolae Derived Cell-Free Protein Expression System for Recombinant Protein Production
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation
Tissue Homogenization and Cell Lysis
Mechanical methods of tissue homogenization
These methods rely on applying external physical force to disrupt...