Changes in Donor Utilization and Outcomes for Patients Bridged With Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Armaan F Akbar1, Dianela Perdomo2, Benjamin L Shou1
1From the Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Insights
The 2018 heart allocation policy change increased mortality for left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-bridged heart transplant (HT) recipients. Patients with higher priority status (1 or 2) faced greater 1-year mortality risks post-policy implementation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Health Policy
Background:
- The 2018 organ allocation policy revision aimed to optimize heart transplant (HT) distribution.
- Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are crucial mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure patients awaiting HT.
- Understanding the policy's impact on LVAD-bridged HT recipients is vital for patient management and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on donor characteristics.
- To assess posttransplant outcomes for left ventricular assist device-bridged heart transplant recipients.
- To analyze outcomes in subgroups of unstable and stable LVAD-bridged recipients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 7,384 adult LVAD-bridged HT recipients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database (October 2014-October 2022).
- Categorization into pre-policy (Old Allocation Policy - OAP) and post-policy (New Allocation Policy - NAP) cohorts.
- Comparison of baseline characteristics, donor factors, and posttransplant survival rates using multivariable analysis.
Main Results:
- The NAP cohort (41.2%) showed a shift towards lower priority statuses (3 and 4) compared to the OAP cohort (58.8%, predominantly status 1A).
- NAP recipients had a higher median donor sequence number (9 vs. 3, p < 0.001).
- NAP recipients experienced a 20% higher 1-year mortality (aHR=1.20, p=0.01), and status 1 or 2 recipients had 28% higher 1-year mortality (aHR=1.28, p=0.04) compared to OAP and status 1A, respectively.
Conclusions:
- The 2018 allocation policy change was associated with increased 1-year mortality among LVAD-bridged HT recipients, particularly those with higher acuity statuses (1 and 2).
- The findings suggest a potential disadvantage for sicker LVAD-supported patients under the new policy, necessitating careful monitoring for waitlist decompensation.
- Enhanced surveillance and potential policy adjustments may be needed to ensure equitable outcomes for LVAD-bridged HT candidates.
Abstract:
We studied the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on donor characteristics and posttransplant outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-bridged heart transplant (HT) recipients. Left ventricular assist device-bridged adult HT recipients from October 2014 to October 2022 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized into old allocation policy (OAP) and new allocation policy (NAP) cohorts. Baseline characteristics, posttransplant outcomes, and subgroup analyses of unstable and stable LVAD-bridged recipients were assessed. The study included 7,384 HT recipients; 4,345 (58.8%) were transplanted in the OAP era and 3,039 (41.2%) in the NAP era. Old allocation policy recipients were most frequently status 1A at transplantation (71.1%), whereas NAP recipients were most frequently status 3 (40.0%), and status 4 (31.9%). Median donor sequence number (DSN) was higher in the NAP versus OAP era (9 vs. 3, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, NAP recipients had 20% higher 1 year mortality compared to OAP (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.04-1.40], p = 0.01). Status 1 or 2 recipients had 28% higher 1 year mortality compared to status 1A (aHR = 1.28 [95% CI: 1.01-1.63], p = 0.04). Status 1 and 2 LVAD-supported recipients had higher mortality following the 2018 allocation change, indicating the need for closer surveillance of LVAD-bridged patients who may decompensate on the waitlist.
More Related Videos
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care